Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Test Audit Initiated Without Notice Against Federal Dairy Society Under Section 81 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds That Principles of Natural Justice Require Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Ordering Test Audit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh Ltd., a federal society of dairy societies in Kolhapur district, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a test audit initiated by the State Government under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, the Joint Registrar and Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, the Officer on Special Duty, a Special Auditor, and a private individual. The petitioner contended that the test audit was ordered without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the power under Section 81 of the Act is administrative and does not require a hearing. The Court analyzed the provisions of Section 81 and held that although the power to order a test audit is not quasi-judicial, it must be exercised fairly. The Court found that the impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner, which was a breach of natural justice. Consequently, the Court quashed the order and directed the respondents to issue a fresh notice and provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before proceeding with the test audit. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Audit - Section 81 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Test Audit - Principles of Natural Justice - The petitioner, a federal dairy society, challenged the test audit initiated by the State Government without prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The Court held that the power to order a test audit under Section 81 is not quasi-judicial but must be exercised fairly, and the society must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard before such audit is ordered. The impugned order was quashed as it violated principles of natural justice. (Paras 2-10)

B) Cooperative Law - Audit - Section 81 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Test Audit - Validity - The Court examined the scope of Section 81 and held that while the Registrar has the power to direct a test audit, such power must be exercised in a manner consistent with natural justice. The order in question was set aside, and the respondents were directed to issue a fresh notice and provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before proceeding with the test audit. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the test audit initiated by the State Government under Section 81 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, without issuing prior notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner society, is valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order directing test audit, and directed the respondents to issue a fresh notice and provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before proceeding with the test audit. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Audit under Section 81 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Test audit
  • Cooperative societies
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 139

Writ Petition No. 5873 of 2023

2023-08-28

Nitin Jamdar, Manjusha Deshpande

2023:BHC-AS:24556-DB

Mr. Anil V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Patwardhan i/b. Ms. Mrinal A. Shelar for the Petitioner; Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Special Counsel with Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP, Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. GP and Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3; Mr. G.S. Godbole, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Drupad Patil and Mr. Dheeraj Patil for Respondent No.6

Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh Ltd.

State of Maharashtra, Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies (Dairies), Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies (Dairies), Officer on Special Duty, Special Auditor Class-1, Shoumika Amal Mahadik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the test audit initiated by the State Government under Section 81 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the test audit order and a direction to the respondents to follow principles of natural justice before ordering such audit.

Filing Reason

The test audit was ordered without prior notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner society.

Issues

Whether the test audit under Section 81 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be ordered without prior notice and opportunity of hearing to the society.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the test audit was ordered without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the power under Section 81 is administrative and does not require a hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to order a test audit under Section 81 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, though not quasi-judicial, must be exercised fairly and in accordance with principles of natural justice. The society must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard before such audit is ordered.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has moved this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to question the Test Audit initiated by the Respondent- State Government under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The impugned order was passed without notice to the petitioner, which was a breach of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the test audit order. The Court issued rule and made it returnable forthwith, and the petition was taken up for disposal.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 81
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Complainant Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 34 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Test Audit Initiated Without Notice Against Federal Dairy Society Under Section 81 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds That Principles of Natural Justice Require Prior Notice...