Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Court holds that defendant's defense is sham and moonshine, lacking triable issues, and that the suit is maintainable under Order XXXVII CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Gini Tex Private Limited, a manufacturer and supplier of cotton and linen fabrics, filed a Commercial Summary Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the defendants, Soham Fashion and its partners, seeking recovery of Rs. 45,18,600/- along with interest at 24% per annum from 31st March 2019. The claim was based on goods sold and delivered to the defendants, who had a credit period of 35 days. The defendants issued cheques towards payment, which were dishonored upon presentation. The plaintiff served a statutory notice under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, but the defendants failed to pay. The defendants entered appearance but did not file any affidavit in support of their defense or seek leave to defend. The court noted that the defendants' defense was vague and lacked particulars, amounting to a sham and moonshine defense. The court held that no triable issues were raised and that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 45,18,600/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, along with costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Order XXXVII CPC - Leave to Defend - The court examined whether the defendants raised a triable issue or a sham defense to resist summary judgment. Held that the defense must be bona fide and raise a real issue; otherwise, judgment may be entered for the plaintiff. (Paras 1-6)

B) Commercial Law - Goods Sold and Delivered - Dishonored Cheques - The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 45,18,600/- based on goods supplied and cheques issued by defendants which were dishonored. The court found the claim supported by invoices, delivery challans, and cheque return memos, and the defendants failed to provide any credible defense. (Paras 1-4)

C) Interest - Contractual Interest - 24% per annum - The plaintiff claimed interest at 24% per annum from 31st March 2019. The court granted interest at 18% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, as the contractual rate was not specifically proved. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the defendants have a valid defense or triable issue entitling them to leave to defend the summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 45,18,600/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, along with costs.

Law Points

  • Summary judgment under Order XXXVII CPC
  • Sham and moonshine defense
  • Triable issue
  • Commercial dispute
  • Goods sold and delivered
  • Dishonored cheques
  • Interest on delayed payment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 70

Commercial Summary Suit No. 1383 of 2019

2023-08-29

Kamal Khata, J.

Ms. Akshaya Puthran i/b. S. K. Singhi & Partners LLP for the Plaintiff

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial Summary Suit for recovery of money based on goods sold and delivered and dishonored cheques.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks summary judgment against defendants for Rs. 45,18,600/- with interest at 24% per annum from 31st March 2019 till realization.

Filing Reason

Defendants failed to pay for goods supplied despite issuance of cheques which were dishonored.

Issues

Whether the defendants have a valid defense or triable issue entitling them to leave to defend the summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff submitted that goods were sold and delivered, cheques were issued and dishonored, and defendants have no defense. Defendants did not file any affidavit in support of their defense or seek leave to defend.

Ratio Decidendi

In a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, if the defendant fails to raise a triable issue or present a bona fide defense, the court may enter judgment for the plaintiff. A vague and unsupported defense is considered sham and moonshine.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff has filed the suit in the Commercial Division under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (“CPC”) seeking a summary judgment against the defendants in the sum of Rs. 45,18,600/- and further interest at the rate of 24% per annum from 31st March 2019 till the actual realization of the entire claim. The defendants have not filed any affidavit in support of their defense or sought leave to defend. The defense raised is vague and lacks particulars, amounting to a sham and moonshine defense.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Commercial Summary Suit No. 1383 of 2019 under Order XXXVII CPC. Defendants entered appearance but did not file any affidavit in support of defense or seek leave to defend. The court reserved judgment on 19th July 2023 and pronounced on 29th August 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order XXXVII
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Court holds that defendant's defense is sham and moonshine, lacking triable issues, and that the suit is maintainable...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Construction in Breach of Status Quo — Mandatory Injunction Granted to Restore Access Road. Courts can order restoration of status quo ante even without substantive prayer for ma...