Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Approval for Shikshan Sevak Appointment - Education Department's Failure to Nominate Surplus Candidate Cannot Justify Denial of Approval Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Rajan Sahadeo Ratul (employee) and Tulsuli Aikyavardhak Sangh (management), filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 18th March 2020 of the Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur region, refusing to grant approval to the appointment of the first petitioner as 'Shikshan Sevak' in the junior college of the second petitioner. The petitioners also sought release of grant-in-aid for payment of monthly honorarium. The facts reveal that upon the superannuation of a permanent teacher, the management appointed the first petitioner as Shikshan Sevak. The Deputy Director refused approval on the ground that the government had surplus candidates available. However, the court noted that the government had failed to nominate any candidate out of the surplus candidates and had also failed to communicate with the management. The court found that the matter was covered by its earlier decision in Gramvikas Shikshan Mandal & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors (Writ Petition (St) No.4493 of 2022, decided on 26th April 2023), where it was held that if the government fails to nominate a surplus candidate and fails to communicate, the post cannot remain vacant indefinitely. The court deprecated the Education Department's lackadaisical attitude in persisting with its inflexible approach despite the previous decision. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the Deputy Director to grant approval to the appointment of the first petitioner as Shikshan Sevak and release the grant-in-aid.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Appointment Approval - Shikshan Sevak - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Refusal of approval by Education Officer when government fails to nominate surplus candidate - Held that if the government fails to nominate any candidate out of surplus candidates and fails to communicate with management, the post cannot remain vacant indefinitely; approval must be granted (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Deputy Director of Education can refuse to grant approval to the appointment of a Shikshan Sevak when the government has failed to nominate a surplus candidate for the vacancy

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned order dated 18th March 2020 quashed and set aside. Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur region directed to grant approval to appointment of 1st petitioner as Shikshan Sevak and release grant-in-aid for payment of monthly honorarium.

Law Points

  • Approval of appointment cannot be denied if government fails to nominate surplus candidate
  • Education Department must act reasonably and not persist in inflexible approach after court decision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 99

Writ Petition No. 1423 of 2021

2023-07-03

G.S. Patel, Neela Gokhale

2023:BHC-AS:17857-DB

Narendra Bandiwadekar for Petitioners, VM Mali (AGP) for Respondents-State

Rajan Sahadeo Ratul & Anr

The State of Maharashtra & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal of approval for appointment of Shikshan Sevak

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 18th March 2020 refusing approval and direction to grant approval and release grant-in-aid

Filing Reason

Deputy Director of Education refused to grant approval to appointment of 1st petitioner as Shikshan Sevak on ground of availability of surplus candidates

Previous Decisions

Order dated 18th March 2020 of Deputy Director of Education refusing approval

Issues

Whether the Deputy Director of Education can refuse to grant approval to the appointment of a Shikshan Sevak when the government has failed to nominate a surplus candidate for the vacancy

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the matter is covered by earlier decision in Gramvikas Shikshan Mandal case where it was held that if government fails to nominate surplus candidate, post cannot remain vacant indefinitely Respondent-State argued through affidavit in reply but court found the attitude inflexible and unacceptable

Ratio Decidendi

If the government fails to nominate any candidate out of the surplus candidates for filling up a vacancy and also fails to communicate with the management, the post cannot be allowed to remain vacant for an undetermined period; approval must be granted.

Judgment Excerpts

Our finding was that if the Government has failed to nominate any candidate out of the surplus candidates for filling up a vacancy and has also failed to communicate with the Management, the post cannot be allowed to remain vacant for an undetermined period. Despite the previous decision, the Education Department of the same region has persisted in continuing its inflexible approach and has repeated itself over again. This is unacceptable and we deprecate the lackadaisical attitude adopted by the Education Department of the Kolhapur region.

Procedural History

Writ Petition No. 1423 of 2021 filed in Bombay High Court challenging order dated 18th March 2020 of Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur region. Rule issued, respondent filed affidavit in reply. Heard on 22nd June 2023 and judgment pronounced on 3rd July 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher — Temporary Appointments Do Not Bar Deemed Permanency Under Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977. Continuous Service for More Than Two Years Confers Permanent Status, Termination With...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Approval for Shikshan Sevak Appointment - Education Department's Failure to Nominate Surplus Candidate Cannot Justify Denial of Approval Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act.