Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Goods Carriage Passenger Not Covered by Insurance Policy. Deceased was travelling as a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle, and the insurer is not liable under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, in MACP No.42/2003. The claimants, Thavra Badhu Chavan, Prabhabai Thavra Chavan, and Vimal Thavra Chavan, sought compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- for the death of Vijay Thavra Chavan, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 18/05/2003. The deceased was travelling as a cleaner in a tempo bearing registration No. MH-06-6184, which was a goods carriage. The claimants alleged that the tempo driver was rash and negligent, causing the vehicle to slip into a ditch. The owner of the tempo, Jadhav Janu Valuji, admitted the accident but denied the income of the deceased. The insurer contested liability on the ground that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a goods carriage, and the insurance policy did not cover such risks. The Tribunal held the owner and insurer jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.2,00,000/- with 9% interest. The insurer appealed. The High Court examined the insurance policy and found that it covered only third-party risks and not passengers in a goods carriage. The court held that the insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner for the death of a gratuitous passenger. However, following the principle of 'pay and recover' under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the court directed the insurer to pay the compensation to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the award to the extent that the insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner but must pay and recover.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Carriage - Insurer's Liability - Section 147, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The deceased was travelling as a gratuitous passenger in a goods vehicle (tempo) which was not covered under the insurance policy. The court held that the insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner for the death of a gratuitous passenger, as the policy only covers third-party risks and not passengers in a goods carriage. (Paras 6-10)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Pay and Recover - Section 149, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court directed the insurer to pay the compensation amount to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle, following the principle of 'pay and recover' to protect the interests of the claimants. (Paras 11-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger travelling in a goods carriage?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. The impugned award is modified. The insurer is directed to pay the compensation amount of Rs.2,00,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Insurer's liability
  • gratuitous passenger in goods carriage
  • Section 147 Motor Vehicles Act 1988
  • pay and recover
  • Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 14

First Appeal No.1574 of 2004

2023-06-28

S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh

New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Thavra s/o Badhu Chavan, Prabhabai w/o Thavra Chavan, Vimal d/o Thavra Chavan, Jadhav Janu Valuji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Insurer sought to set aside the award holding it jointly liable to pay compensation

Filing Reason

Insurer disputed liability on ground that deceased was gratuitous passenger in goods carriage not covered by insurance policy

Previous Decisions

Tribunal held owner and insurer jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.2,00,000/- with 9% interest

Issues

Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation for death of a gratuitous passenger in a goods carriage? Whether the principle of 'pay and recover' applies?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant/Insurer: The deceased was travelling as a gratuitous passenger in a goods carriage; the insurance policy does not cover such risk; the insurer is not liable. Respondents/Claimants: The deceased was a cleaner and was travelling in the course of employment; the insurer is liable.

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is not liable to indemnify the owner for the death of a gratuitous passenger in a goods carriage as the insurance policy under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not cover such risks. However, to protect the interests of the claimants, the insurer must pay the compensation and then recover it from the owner under the 'pay and recover' principle.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant / insurer impugns the judgment and award dated 03/09/2004, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna... The Tribunal... passed the judgment and award dated 03/09/2004 holding that, the respondent nos.1 and 2 are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- along with interest @ 9% p.a.

Procedural History

Claimants filed MACP No.42/2003 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna. Tribunal passed award on 03/09/2004. Insurer filed First Appeal No.1574 of 2004 before Bombay High Court. Appeal reserved on 07.06.2023 and pronounced on 28.06.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147, Section 149, Section 166, Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in NI Act Case Due to Non-Appearance of Complainant - Held That Dismissal for Default Under Section 256 CrPC Is an Acquittal and Appealable. The court set aside the Magistrate's order dismissing compl...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Union Minister in PMLA Case — Economic Offence Bail Principles Reiterated. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA are not absolute and must be applied with reference to the facts, and that ...