Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Professor for WhatsApp Status Messages on Kashmir and Pakistan Independence Day — Messages Did Not Promote Enmity Under Section 153-A IPC. The Court held that mere expression of political opinion or historical fact without intention to promote disharmony does not attract Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Javed Ahmed Hajam, a professor at Sanjay Ghodavat College, was a member of a WhatsApp group for parents and teachers. Between 13.08.2022 and 15.08.2022, he uploaded two WhatsApp status messages: (1) 'AUGUST 5 BLACK DAY JAMMU & KASHMIR' and (2) '14th August Happy Independence Day Pakistan'. Below the first message, he added 'Article 370 was abrogated, we are not happy'. Based on these, the Hatkanangale Police Station registered an FIR under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, alleging promotion of enmity between different groups. The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR. The petitioner's counsel argued that the messages were not derogatory and did not intend to promote disharmony or hatred. Reliance was placed on Supreme Court judgments in Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab and Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra, and a Bombay High Court judgment in Sandeep Arjun Kudale v. State of Maharashtra. The State opposed, contending that the messages had the tendency to promote ill-will. The Court analyzed the ingredients of Section 153-A IPC, emphasizing that the words must have the intention or tendency to promote enmity between groups on grounds of religion, race, etc., or disturb public tranquility. The Court found that the messages merely expressed a political opinion regarding the abrogation of Article 370 and a historical fact about Pakistan's Independence Day, without any incitement to hatred or violence. The messages were uploaded as WhatsApp status, which is a temporary and limited broadcast, not a public communication. The Court held that the FIR did not disclose the essential ingredients of Section 153-A IPC and quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising from it.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Section 153-A IPC - Promotion of Enmity - WhatsApp Status Messages - The petitioner uploaded WhatsApp status messages referring to August 5 as Black Day for Jammu & Kashmir and wishing Happy Independence Day to Pakistan, with a caption expressing unhappiness over abrogation of Article 370. The Court held that these messages did not promote disharmony or hatred between different groups on grounds of religion, race, etc., and lacked the requisite intention or tendency to disturb public tranquility. The FIR was quashed. (Paras 2-8)

B) Criminal Law - Section 153-A IPC - Ingredients - Intention and Tendency - The Court reiterated that for an offence under Section 153-A IPC, the words must have the intention or tendency to promote enmity between groups. Mere expression of a political opinion or historical fact, without more, does not attract the provision. Reliance placed on Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab and Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra. (Paras 4-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether WhatsApp status messages stating 'AUGUST 5 BLACK DAY JAMMU & KASHMIR' and '14th August Happy Independence Day Pakistan' with the caption 'Article 370 was abrogated, we are not happy' constitute an offence under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR registered at Hatkanangale Police Station, Kolhapur, under Section 153-A IPC and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Section 153-A IPC requires intention to promote disharmony or hatred between groups
  • mere expression of opinion or political view not sufficient
  • WhatsApp status with limited visibility not public communication
  • abrogation of Article 370 as political issue not covered
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 67

Criminal Writ Petition No.94 of 2023

2023-04-10

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, M.M. SATHAYE

2023:BHC-AS:11121-DB

Mr. Karim Pathan (for Petitioner), Mr. J.P. Yagnik (APP for State)

Mr. Javed Ahmed Hajam

The State of Maharashtra, Mr. Sangram Pandit Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR registered under Section 153-A IPC for WhatsApp status messages.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. (not mentioned) registered at Hatkanangale Police Station, Kolhapur, under Section 153-A IPC.

Filing Reason

Petitioner uploaded WhatsApp status messages stating 'AUGUST 5 BLACK DAY JAMMU & KASHMIR' and '14th August Happy Independence Day Pakistan' with caption 'Article 370 was abrogated, we are not happy', which were alleged to promote enmity between different groups.

Issues

Whether the WhatsApp status messages uploaded by the petitioner constitute an offence under Section 153-A IPC? Whether the FIR discloses the essential ingredients of Section 153-A IPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the messages were not derogatory and did not intend to promote disharmony or hatred; they merely expressed a political opinion. Relied on Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab, Manzar Sayeed Khan v. State of Maharashtra, and Sandeep Arjun Kudale v. State of Maharashtra. State's APP argued that the messages had the tendency to promote disharmony or feeling of hatred or ill-will between different groups.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 153-A IPC, the words must have the intention or tendency to promote enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, etc., or disturb public tranquility. Mere expression of political opinion or historical fact, without more, does not attract the provision. The WhatsApp status messages in question did not contain any incitement to hatred or violence and were not communicated publicly in a manner likely to disturb harmony.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is a Professor in Sanjay Ghodavat Collage. There is a whatsapp group comprising parents-teachers organization and the petitioner is a member of this whatsapp group. It is alleged that between 13.08.2022 and 15.08.2022, the petitioner being a member of this whatsapp group, created whatsapp status giving two messages namely; (1) AUGUST 5 BLACK DAY JAMMU & KASHMIR and (2) 14th August Happy Independence Day Pakistan. Reliance is placed upon the view taken by the Supreme Court in the case of Balwant Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and Manzar Sayeed Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. The Court held that the messages did not promote disharmony or hatred between different groups and lacked the requisite intention or tendency to disturb public tranquility.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.94 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of FIR registered under Section 153-A IPC. The petition was heard and disposed of at the admission stage with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 153-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Professor for WhatsApp Status Messages on Kashmir and Pakistan Independence Day — Messages Did Not Promote Enmity Under Section 153-A IPC. The Court held that mere expression of political opinion or historical ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Rejection for Non-Submission of 'Form B' Not Required by Tender Conditions. Court holds that rejection of bid was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing reconsideration of petitioner...