Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Panchayat Resolution for Violation of Natural Justice. Resolution passed without notice to petitioner and without considering his objections set aside.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 40
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Roque Menezes, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging a resolution passed by the Village Panchayat of Chodan-Madel, Tiswadi-Goa. The resolution, passed on an unspecified date, allegedly affected the petitioner's rights without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioner contended that the Panchayat had acted arbitrarily and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent no.1, Ramesh Volvoikar, supported the resolution, while the Panchayat remained absent despite service. The Court heard arguments from both sides and examined the record. The Court found that the resolution was passed without any notice to the petitioner and without considering his objections. Relying on the principles of natural justice, the Court held that such a resolution cannot be sustained. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned resolution, and directed the Panchayat to hear the petitioner before taking any further action in the matter. The Court also made the rule returnable immediately with the consent of the learned counsel.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Natural Justice - Resolution without Notice - Section 97 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - The petitioner challenged a resolution passed by the Village Panchayat of Chodan-Madel which allegedly affected his rights without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The Court held that the resolution was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and set it aside, directing the Panchayat to hear the petitioner before taking any further action. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a resolution passed by a Village Panchayat without notice to the affected party and without considering his objections is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned resolution, and directed the Panchayat to hear the petitioner before taking any further action. Rule made returnable immediately.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to be Heard
  • Panchayat Resolution
  • Writ Jurisdiction
  • Section 97 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act
  • 1994
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 117

WRIT PETITION NO.109 OF 2022

2023-03-21

M. S. SONAK, J.

2023:BHC-GOA:702

Mr Prasheen Lotlikar for the Petitioner, Mr Gaurish Agni with Mr Kishan Kavlekar for Respondent no.1

Mr. Roque Menezes

1. Ramesh Volvoikar, 2. Village Panchayat of Chodan – Madel, through its Secretary

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a resolution passed by the Village Panchayat of Chodan-Madel.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the impugned resolution and direction to the Panchayat to hear him before taking any action.

Filing Reason

The resolution was passed without notice to the petitioner and without considering his objections, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the resolution passed by the Village Panchayat without notice to the petitioner is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the resolution was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. Respondent no.1 supported the resolution.

Ratio Decidendi

A resolution passed by a Panchayat without notice to the affected party and without considering his objections is in violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

Though the petitioner has an alternate remedy under the Panchayat Act, the impugned resolution was passed without any notice to the petitioner and without considering his objections.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging a resolution of the Village Panchayat of Chodan-Madel. The Court heard the parties and passed the judgment on 21st March 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994: Section 97
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Panchayat Resolution for Violation of Natural Justice. Resolution passed without notice to petitioner and without considering his objections set aside.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Tender Notification for Shop at Bus Station. Petitioner lacked locus standi as he was not a bidder and failed to demonstrate any legal right or interest in the tender process.