Search Results for "MCOCA"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Discharge of Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Under Section 23(2) MCOCA Found to Be Without Application of Mind, Leading to Discharge of All Accused.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 8th August 2014 passed by the Special Judge under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Bail Granted by High Court in MCOCA Case, Condemns Forum Shopping. The Court held that granting bail in a writ petition challenging vires of MCOCA provisions, after withdrawal of a regular bail application, amounts to impermissible forum shopping.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against an interim order of the Bombay High Court granting bail to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Appeals Under MCOCA: Examining Procedural Compliance and Judicial Review

The case involves appeals under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA), challenging orders rejecting applications ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Sanction to Prosecute Police Officer Under MCOCA. Private Complaint for Offences Under MCOCA Requires Prior Sanction from Competent Authority Under Section 23 of the Act.

The petitioner, Avinash Tukaram Sanas, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 23(2) of MCOCA — Conviction for Attempt to Murder Set Aside as Cognizance Without Valid Sanction is Void Ab Initio.

The case involves three appeals filed by accused persons (original accused Nos. 3, 4, and 5) against their conviction under the Maharashtra Control of...