Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Proper Sanction. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Requires Approval from Principal Chief Commissioner Under Section 151(1), Not Joint Commissioner.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, MA Multi-Infra Development Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2015-16. The primary ground was that the notice was issued beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, and therefore, approval for its issuance ought to have been obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax in terms of Section 151(1) of the Act, rather than from the Joint Commissioner. The court examined Section 151, which provides for sanction for issue of notice under Section 148. Sub-section (1) applies when the notice is issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, requiring sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director. Sub-section (2) applies when the notice is issued within four years, requiring sanction from the Joint Commissioner. The court noted that the assessment year in question ended on 31st March 2016, and the notice was issued on 31st March 2021, which is beyond four years. Therefore, the sanction should have been obtained under Section 151(1) from the Principal Chief Commissioner. However, the record showed that the sanction was granted by the Joint Commissioner, which was not the proper authority. The court held that the notice was invalid due to lack of proper sanction and quashed it. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reassessment Notice - Sanction under Section 151 - The issue was whether a notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year requires sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner under Section 151(1) or can be sanctioned by the Joint Commissioner under Section 151(2). The court held that since the notice was issued after the expiry of four years, the sanction must be obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner as per Section 151(1), and the approval by the Joint Commissioner was invalid. (Paras 1-6)

B) Income Tax - Reassessment - Time Limit - Section 149 - The notice under Section 148 was issued on 31st March 2021 for assessment year 2015-16, which is beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year (31st March 2016). Therefore, the proviso to Section 149(1)(b) applies, requiring that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment due to failure to disclose material facts fully and truly. The court did not delve into this aspect as the notice was quashed on the ground of lack of proper sanction. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year requires sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner under Section 151(1) or can be sanctioned by the Joint Commissioner under Section 151(2)?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2015-16.

Law Points

  • Sanction for notice under Section 148
  • Reassessment beyond four years
  • Section 151(1) Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Proper authority for approval
  • Jurisdictional requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 195

WRIT PETITION NO. 1650 OF 2022

2023-01-09

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, KAMAL KHATA

Mr. Jeet Kamdar with Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for petitioner; Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma with Ms. Shilpa Goel for respondents

MA Multi-Infra Development Pvt. Ltd.

The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(2)(1), Mumbai; Additional/Joint/Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi; Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-3, Mumbai; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 for assessment year 2015-16.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year and the sanction was obtained from the Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner as required under Section 151(1).

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years requires sanction under Section 151(1) from the Principal Chief Commissioner? Whether the sanction granted by the Joint Commissioner under Section 151(2) is valid for a notice issued beyond four years?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that since the notice was issued beyond four years, approval should have been obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner under Section 151(1), not from the Joint Commissioner. Respondents argued that the sanction was properly obtained from the Joint Commissioner.

Ratio Decidendi

For a notice under Section 148 issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the sanction must be obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director under Section 151(1), and not from the Joint Commissioner under Section 151(2). Failure to obtain proper sanction renders the notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner challenges the notice dated 31st March 2021 u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2015-16, inter-alia, on the ground that since the same has been issued beyond the period of four years, approval for issuance of the same ought to have been obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax in terms of section 151(1) of the Act. Section 151 reads as under : “151 Sanction for issue of notice --(1) No notice shall be issued under section 148 by an Assessing Officer, after the expiry of a period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director or Chief Commissioner or Director has recorded reasons for issuing such notice.”

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the notice under Section 148. The court reserved judgment on 4th January 2023 and pronounced on 9th January 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 148, 149, 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Proper Sanction. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Requires Approval from Principal Chief Commissioner Under Section 151(1), Not Joint Commissioner.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Theft of Documents in Corporate Dispute — Internal Audit Reports and Confidential Documents Not 'Stolen' as They Were Obtained Through Legal Proceedings. The Court held that the ingredients of theft unde...