Search Results for "Children's obligation"

783 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Benefit of Doubt Extended Where Sole Eyewitness Testimony Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Match Ocular Version Under Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the death of Mandeep Kumar on 21.10.2018 following an alleged attack by seven masked persons. The appellant, Sagar, was identifie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra RTE Amendment Rules 2024 Exempting Private Unaided Schools Near Government/Aided Schools from 25% Quota. The Amendment Rules are held intra vires the RTE Act and Constitution, as they promote efficient resource allocation and prevent duplication of facilities.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the Maharashtra Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Rules,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Life Imprisonment for Kidnapping and Attempt to Murder in POCSO Case — Conviction Based on Testimony of Minor Victim and Medical Evidence

The judgment arises from three appeals against the conviction and sentence of Osban Fernandes (A.1) and Ramesh Bagve (A.2) by the Children's Court at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...