Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of DV Act Proceedings from Junnar to Thane for Wife's Convenience and Safety. Transfer Granted Under Section 407 CrPC as Wife Faced Threats and Inconvenience in Traveling to Junnar.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 166
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sonika Vishnudas Kadam, filed a Criminal Application under Section 407(1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking transfer of Criminal M.A. No. 17 of 2017 pending before the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar, to the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane. The applicant married respondent No.1 on 26th April 2016 and resided at Ghatkopar, Mumbai. She was allegedly ousted from her matrimonial home on 18th September 2016 and subsequently filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) at Junnar, where she was residing with her uncle. The respondent No.1 filed a marriage petition for judicial separation in the Family Court at Bandra, which was later withdrawn. The applicant contended that she faced threats from the respondents and that it was inconvenient and unsafe for her to travel to Junnar for court proceedings, as she was residing in Thane. The respondents opposed the transfer, arguing that the applicant had chosen Junnar as the venue and that the court had jurisdiction. The court considered the rival submissions and held that the convenience and safety of the applicant-wife are paramount. The court noted that the applicant had moved to Thane after the alleged ouster and that the respondents had threatened her. The court allowed the application and transferred the DV Act proceedings from Junnar to Thane, directing the JMFC, Thane to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Section 407(1)(c) CrPC - Convenience and Safety - Applicant-wife sought transfer of DV Act proceedings from Junnar to Thane due to threats and inconvenience - Court allowed transfer holding that the wife's safety and convenience outweigh the husband's objections - Held that transfer is necessary to ensure fair trial and protect the applicant from harassment (Paras 1-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Criminal M.A. No. 17 of 2017 pending before the JMFC, Junnar should be transferred to Thane for the convenience and safety of the applicant-wife.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and transferred Criminal M.A. No. 17 of 2017 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar to the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane. The JMFC, Thane was directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 407 CrPC
  • convenience of parties
  • safety of applicant
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 164

Criminal Application No.502 of 2022

2024-02-05

Madhav J. Jamdar

Mr. Nikhil D. Patil, Mr. Mainak Adhikary, Ms. S. S. Kaushik

Sonika Vishnudas Kadam

Vishnudas Haribhau Kadam & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for transfer of proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Criminal M.A. No. 17 of 2017 from JMFC Junnar to JMFC Thane.

Filing Reason

Applicant-wife faced threats and inconvenience in traveling to Junnar for court proceedings.

Previous Decisions

Family Court at Bandra ordered interim maintenance of Rs.7,000 per month and Rs.5,000 per month for rent in Marriage Petition No.A-3101 of 2016, which was later withdrawn by respondent No.1.

Issues

Whether the DV Act proceedings should be transferred from Junnar to Thane for the convenience and safety of the applicant-wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that she was ousted from her matrimonial home and faced threats, making it unsafe and inconvenient to travel to Junnar. Respondents argued that the applicant had chosen Junnar as the venue and that the court had jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The convenience and safety of the applicant-wife are paramount considerations for transfer of proceedings under Section 407 CrPC, especially when she faces threats and inconvenience in traveling to the existing venue.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a Criminal Application filed under Section 407 (1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Applicant was ousted from her matrimonial house on 18th September 2016. The Applicant moved to her uncle’s residence at Dingare, Taluka-Junnar, District-Pune, and subsequently filed proceedings under the D.V. Act before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal M.A. No. 17 of 2017 under the DV Act before JMFC Junnar. Respondent No.1 filed Marriage Petition No.A-3101 of 2016 in Family Court Bandra, which was withdrawn on 1st April 2022. The applicant then filed the present application for transfer under Section 407 CrPC.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 407(1)(c)
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 10, 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Plaints Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Barred by Limitation. Court holds that while considering an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the court must ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case, Upholds Conviction Under Sections 324 and 323 IPC. Absence of Intention to Kill Found as Assault Was to Extract Money, Not Murder.