Bombay High Court Allows Doctor's Petition for Relaxation of Bail Conditions — Implied Power Under Section 439(1)(b) CrPC Recognized. Trial Court erred in holding it had no power to modify bail conditions; the power to grant bail includes the power to modify conditions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 23
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Rajaram Dhondiba Shendge, a doctor by profession, was granted bail in R.C.C. No.22 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga, subject to certain conditions. Conditions 6 to 9 required him to attend the police station once a month, attend the trial court on specific Mondays, not change residence without permission, and denied any exemption from attendance. The petitioner filed an application (Exhibit-101) seeking relaxation of these conditions, which was rejected by the Trial Court on 7th August 2023 on the ground that it had no power to modify conditions imposed under Section 439 CrPC. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The High Court considered the submissions of the petitioner's counsel, who argued that the Trial Court erred in holding it lacked power, and that Section 439(1)(b) CrPC confers implied power to modify conditions. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, Cannanore v. M.K. Mohamad Kunhi, which established that an express grant of statutory power carries with it by necessary implication the authority to do all things necessary to make the grant effective. The High Court held that the power to grant bail includes the power to modify or relax conditions, and the Trial Court's view was erroneous. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Trial Court to decide the application afresh on its own merits, in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail Conditions - Modification - Implied Power - Section 439(1)(b) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The petitioner, a doctor, sought relaxation of bail conditions requiring monthly police attendance and court appearances. The Trial Court rejected the application holding it had no power to modify conditions. The High Court held that the power to grant bail under Section 439 CrPC includes the implied power to modify or relax conditions, relying on the doctrine of implied powers. The impugned order was set aside and the application was remitted for fresh consideration. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Magistrate has the power to relax or modify conditions imposed at the time of granting bail, even if not expressly provided under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 7th August 2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga, is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Trial Court to decide the application (Exhibit-101) afresh on its own merits, in accordance with law. The writ petition is allowed.

Law Points

  • Implied power
  • Bail conditions relaxation
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Doctrine of implied powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 113

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1593 of 2023

2024-02-29

Sanjay A. Deshmukh, J.

2024:BHC-AUG:8087

Mr. Prashant Prabhakar Giri for Petitioner, Mr. Mukesh K. Goyanka, APP for Respondent/State

Dr. Rajaram s/o Dhondiba Shendge

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging the order of the Magistrate rejecting application for relaxation of bail conditions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the impugned order and relaxation of bail conditions.

Filing Reason

The Trial Court rejected the application for relaxation of bail conditions on the ground that it had no power to modify conditions imposed under Section 439 CrPC.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court passed an order dated 7th August 2023 below Exhibit-101 in R.C.C. No.22 of 2022 rejecting the application for relaxation of conditions 6 to 9 imposed at the time of granting bail.

Issues

Whether a Magistrate has the power to relax or modify conditions imposed at the time of granting bail under Section 439 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Trial Court erred in holding it had no power to modify conditions; Section 439(1)(b) CrPC confers implied power to modify conditions. Petitioner relied on the doctrine of implied powers as established in Income Tax Officer, Cannanore v. M.K. Mohamad Kunhi.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to grant bail under Section 439 CrPC includes the implied power to modify or relax conditions imposed at the time of granting bail. The doctrine of implied powers applies, as an express grant of statutory power carries with it by necessary implication the authority to do all things necessary to make the grant effective.

Judgment Excerpts

It is a firmly established rule that an express grant of statutory power carries with it by necessary implication the authority to do all things necessary to make the grant effective. The learned Trial Court erred and held that it has no such power to relax the conditions as it is not expressly provided under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Procedural History

The petitioner was granted bail in R.C.C. No.22 of 2022 with conditions. He filed an application (Exhibit-101) for relaxation of conditions 6 to 9. The Trial Court rejected the application on 7th August 2023. The petitioner then filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1593 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, which was heard and disposed of on 29th February 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 439, Section 439(1)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Doctor's Petition for Relaxation of Bail Conditions — Implied Power Under Section 439(1)(b) CrPC Recognized. Trial Court erred in holding it had no power to modify bail conditions; the power to grant bail includes the power...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Upholds Easement of Necessity Over Cart Track in Partition Dispute Between Brothers. Plaintiff Granted Declaration and Mandatory Injunction for Access to Landlocked Property Under Section 13 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.