Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Lecturer Under Old Pension Scheme — Directs State to Compute Pension Based on Last Drawn Salary and Full Service Period from Initial Appointment. Petitioner's claim for pension and gratuity under the old pension scheme of 1983 upheld, treating him as fully qualified from initial appointment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Gore, a retired lecturer, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to grant and release his retirement benefits, including pension and gratuity, under the old pension scheme of 1983. He claimed that his service period from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021 should be considered for computation of benefits based on his last drawn salary, and that he should be treated as fully qualified from the date of initial appointment. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner was not entitled to the old pension scheme due to lack of qualifications at the time of appointment. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the petition, holding that the petitioner is entitled to retirement benefits under the old pension scheme. The court directed the respondents to compute and release pension and gratuity based on his last drawn salary and full service period, treating him as fully qualified from the initial appointment date. The court also ordered payment of interest at 6% per annum on delayed payments from the date of superannuation until actual payment.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Old Pension Scheme - Entitlement - Petitioner, a lecturer, sought pension and gratuity under the old pension scheme of 1983 based on last drawn salary and full service from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021 - Court held that the petitioner is entitled to retirement benefits under the old pension scheme, and directed the respondents to compute pension and gratuity considering his entire service period and last drawn salary, treating him as fully qualified from initial appointment (Paras 1-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and gratuity under the old pension scheme of 1983 based on his last drawn salary and full service period from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021, treating him as fully qualified from the initial date of appointment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant and release the retirement benefits to the petitioner including pension and gratuity on the basis of his last drawn salary considering his service period from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021 as per the provisions of the old pension scheme of 1983, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of superannuation till the actual payment, and by treating the petitioner as fully qualified from his initial date of appointment.

Law Points

  • Pension
  • Gratuity
  • Retirement Benefits
  • Old Pension Scheme
  • Qualification
  • Last Drawn Salary
  • Service Period
  • Writ of Mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 46

Writ Petition No. 12435 of 2022

2025-09-25

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Ashwini D. Bhobe

2025:BHC-AS:41619-DB

Ms. Devyani Kulkarni with Ms. Sanskruti Yagnik for the Petitioner, Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP with Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State

Rajendrakumar Gore

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Higher Education, The Joint Director of Higher Education, Pen Education Society’s Bhausaheb Nene Arts, Science and Commerce College, Pen Education Society

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for grant of retirement benefits under old pension scheme.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks direction to respondents to grant and release pension and gratuity based on last drawn salary and full service period from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021 under the old pension scheme of 1983, with interest.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's retirement benefits were not granted by the respondents despite his superannuation on 30.09.2021.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and gratuity under the old pension scheme of 1983 based on his last drawn salary and full service period from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021, treating him as fully qualified from the initial date of appointment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he served as a lecturer from 21.06.1991 to 30.09.2021 and is entitled to retirement benefits under the old pension scheme of 1983 based on his last drawn salary and full service period. Respondents contended that the petitioner was not qualified at the time of initial appointment and therefore not entitled to the old pension scheme.

Ratio Decidendi

A retired employee is entitled to pension and gratuity under the old pension scheme based on his last drawn salary and full service period, and any dispute regarding qualifications at the time of initial appointment does not disentitle him from receiving retirement benefits if he has rendered long service and was subsequently qualified.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition is listed in the Special Pension Category Board. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (a) and (b)...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 12435 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus for retirement benefits. The petition was listed in the Special Pension Category Board and heard on 25th September 2025, with rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Compassionate Appointment Claim After 14-Year Delay. Purpose of Compassionate Appointment Defeated by Lapse of Time as Family Survived Without Government Assistance.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Advance Licence Case — Duty Exemption Denied for Failure to Fulfill Export Obligation. The court held that the respondent-assessee failed to produce evidence of actual use of imported Lauryl Alcohol in th...