Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempted Murder. The court upheld the conviction of the appellants for murder and attempted murder under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, based on credible witness testimonies.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal against the conviction of the appellants for murder and attempted murder under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellants were found guilty by the trial court, which was upheld by the Allahabad High Court. The incident occurred on 4th November 1979, when the deceased, Ismail, and the informant, Bashir Mohammed, were attacked by the appellants while on their way to a meeting. The prosecution established that the appellants had previously threatened the deceased due to his involvement in a case against them. During the attack, the appellants, armed with firearms, pursued the deceased, ultimately leading to his death. The trial court's conviction was based on the testimonies of several witnesses, which the High Court found credible. The appellants contended that the evidence was insufficient and that not all of them were involved in the actual attack. However, the court emphasized the principle of common intention under Section 34 IPC, stating that all participants in a crime share responsibility for the actions taken in furtherance of their common purpose. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts' findings and the application of the law regarding common intention and participation in the crime.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder and Attempted Murder - Conviction under Section 302 and Section 307 IPC - The court upheld the conviction of the appellants for murder and attempted murder, finding sufficient evidence of their participation and common intention in the crime - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 307 - The court noted that the evidence of witnesses was credible and supported the conviction, affirming the application of Section 34 IPC due to the common purpose shared by the appellants (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants were rightly convicted under Section 302 and Section 307 IPC, and whether the application of Section 34 IPC was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the convictions under Sections 302 and 307 IPC and the application of Section 34 IPC.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • common intention
  • participation in crime
  • co-conspirators liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (08) 133

Criminal Appeal No. 193 of 2005

2008-08-12

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA

Aizaz, Ahmad Hasan, Jan Alam

State of U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and attempted murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to overturn their conviction.

Filing Reason

Appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court upholding their conviction.

Previous Decisions

The trial court convicted the appellants, which was affirmed by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the appellants were rightly convicted under Section 302 and Section 307 IPC Whether the application of Section 34 IPC was justified

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the evidence was insufficient and that not all were involved in the attack Respondent supported the conviction based on credible witness testimonies

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the principle of common intention under Section 34 IPC, stating that all participants in a crime share responsibility for actions taken in furtherance of their common purpose.

Judgment Excerpts

The court upheld the conviction of the appellants for murder and attempted murder. The evidence of PWs. 1, 2 & 3 is clear and cogent.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellants, which was upheld by the Allahabad High Court. The appellants then filed an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Reviews Legality of Arrest and Remand in NCR to FIR Conversion Case; Petitioner Challenged FIR Registration on Same Facts After Non-Cognizable Report Without Magistrate's Permission. Court Considered Mandatory Safeguard Under Sectio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Declaring Termination of Probationary Teacher Illegal. Termination of Probationary Teacher for Unsatisfactory Performance Requires Compliance with Section 5(3) of MEPS Act...