High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal from Order in Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Concerning Building Permission and Unauthorized Construction. Appeal from Order No. 744 of 2024 Involves Partnership Firm, Pune Municipal Corporation, Architect, and Numerous Flat Purchasers; Key Issue Relates to Interim Relief in Construction Dispute.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The extracted judgment text comprises only the cause title and party list of an appeal from order pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The appeal is numbered AO-744-2024 and arises from Order No. 744 of 2024. The appellants are M/s. Krishna Constructions, a partnership firm, through its partners Mrs. Shikha M. Mistry and Mr. Mittal Pranjivan Mistry. The respondents include Mr. Subhash Uttam Dalvi, the Pune Municipal Corporation and its Commissioner, the City Engineer of the Building Permission and Unauthorized Construction Control Department, M/s. Sandeep Hardikar & Associates (a licensed architect firm), and numerous individual flat purchasers or owners. The nature of the dispute appears to relate to building permission and alleged unauthorized construction, given the involvement of the municipal corporation's building permission department and the architect, but the specific facts, legal issues, arguments, and court's decision are not provided in the extracted text. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the appeal from order; no prior judicial orders or interim relief details are mentioned. Accordingly, the court's analysis, ratio decidendi, and final order cannot be stated. The judgment text uploaded on 10 June 2025 contains no substantive paragraphs beyond the party array, and therefore the legal principles and outcome remain unknown from this extract.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Appeal from Order - Interim Relief - Not mentioned - The appeal from order was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay; the extracted text does not include the substantive legal issues, reasoning, or directions of the court (Paras not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 744 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Civil appellate jurisdiction
  • appeal from order
  • building permission
  • unauthorized construction
  • interim relief
  • Pune Municipal Corporation
  • partnership firm
  • flat purchasers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 32

Appeal from Order No. 744 of 2024

M/s. Krishna Constructions, a partnership firm, through its partners Mrs. Shikha M. Mistry and Mr. Mittal Pranjivan Mistry

Mr. Subhash Uttam Dalvi; The Pune Municipal Corporation; The Commissioner, Pune Municipal Corporation; City Engineer, Building Permission and Unauthorized Construction Control Department; M/s. Sandeep Hardikar & Associates through authorized signatory Sandeep Hardikar; and numerous individual respondents as per cause title

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal from order before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, involving a construction dispute with municipal authorities and flat purchasers.

Previous Decisions

Appeal from Order No. 744 of 2024 (details not provided)

Procedural History

Appeal from Order No. 744 of 2024 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; prior proceedings not detailed in the extracted text.

Acts & Sections

  • Partnership Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal from Order in Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Concerning Building Permission and Unauthorized Construction. Appeal from Order No. 744 of 2024 Involves Partnership Firm, Pune Municipal Corporation, Ar...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal and Allows Claimants' Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld, Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 2,90,000 to Rs. 4,50,000. The court held that the driver's failure to ex...