Bombay High Court Records Non-Deposit in Commercial Summary Suit; Defendant Failed to Deposit Despite Supreme Court Extension

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a commercial summary suit filed by National Commodity Clearing Ltd. against Dita Comtrade Limited. The High Court had previously directed the defendant to deposit a certain amount. The defendant challenged that order in the Supreme Court. On 18 February 2025, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's order but extended the time for deposit until 31 March 2025. When the matter came up before the High Court on 2 April 2025, further directions were passed. At the hearing on 23 April 2025, the plaintiff tendered a Non-deposit Certificate dated 9 April 2025, indicating that the defendant had not made the required deposit. The court recorded the tendering of the certificate. The judgment text ends abruptly, and further orders or directions, if any, are not available in the excerpt.

Headnote

A) Commercial Law - Deposit Order Compliance - Non-deposit after extension - Act Not Mentioned - The court recorded the tendering of a Non-deposit Certificate by the plaintiff, indicating that the defendant had not deposited amounts as directed despite the Supreme Court's extension of time until 31 March 2025. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the defendant complied with the court's deposit order within the extended time granted by the Supreme Court

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Deposit order compliance
  • extension of time for deposit
  • non-deposit certificate
  • commercial summary suit procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 66

Commercial Summary Suit No. 32 of 2020

2025-04-23

Abhay Ahuja

2025:BHC-OS:7033

Mr. Kevic Setalvad, Mr. Jehaan Lalkaka, Ms. Shirley Mody for Plaintiff; Mr. Pesi Modi, Ms. Kalpana Desai for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial summary suit for recovery of money

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought compliance with deposit order

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to deposit amount as per court order

Previous Decisions

Supreme Court order dated 18-02-2025 extending time for deposit; High Court order dated 02-04-2025

Issues

Whether defendant complied with deposit order within extended time

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff tendered Non-deposit Certificate showing no deposit made

Judgment Excerpts

Mr.Setalvad, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff, has tendered across the bar Non-deposit Certificate dated 9th April 2025 submitting that as directed by this Court by order dated 2nd April 2025, application had been made to the Prothonotary & Senior Master in view of the order dated 18th February 2025 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court observing that the Hon'ble Supreme Court was not inclined to interfere with the order of this Court, however, extending the time to deposit till 31st March 2025 and that a fresh Non-deposit Certificate has been...

Procedural History

Commercial Summary Suit No. 32 of 2020 filed. High Court ordered deposit of amount (date not specified). Defendant appealed to Supreme Court; Supreme Court on 18-02-2025 extended time until 31-03-2025. On 02-04-2025, High Court passed further order regarding deposit. On 23-04-2025, matter called out and plaintiff tendered Non-deposit Certificate.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Records Non-Deposit in Commercial Summary Suit; Defendant Failed to Deposit Despite Supreme Court Extension
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.