Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Common Judgment of Bombay High Court Concerning Rescission of Portuguese-Era Alvara Land Grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Dispute Centered on Whether Collector Validly Rescinded Grants Under Article 12 of Organic Structure of Lands of Nagar Haveli (OA) for Alleged Non-Cultivation, and Effect of Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common judgment dated 11, 15, 16, 17.02.2005 delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in several Second Appeals concerning recission of land grants relating to properties in the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The dispute traced back to the erstwhile Portuguese legal regime. Under the Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli (OA), promulgated on 22.09.1919, agricultural lands in Nagar Haveli were granted on perpetual lease rights known as 'Alvaras'. These Alvaras, issued between 1923 and 1930 to the appellants' predecessors-in-title, were governed by the contract of emphyteusis, which transferred beneficial ownership to the grantee subject to an annual payment known as emphyteutic pension or canon. Article 7 of the OA made the Portuguese Civil Code applicable to concession contracts with certain modifications, including that rent be paid in cash, the contract be made administratively, and default in rent gave the State a right to produce and subsequently the immovable property under Articles 880 and 887 of the Civil Code. Article 8 required emphyteutic pensions to be paid in the taluk revenue office from November 1 to March 31 each year. Article 11 permitted Alvara holders to transfer, mortgage, or encumber their beneficial ownership, with transferees subrogated to the same obligations. Article 12 imposed a clear duty to cultivate land, and provided for rescission of the concession contract without indemnity or formal procedure for various failures: not starting agricultural works within one year, not bringing one-fourth of cultivable land under regular cultivation within two years, not increasing cultivated area annually by specified fractions, or not completing building work within time. Article 16 dealt with removal of building materials upon rescission. The appellants claimed that despite poor soil quality, their predecessors brought 5/8th of the land under regular cultivation, growing low-yield grains like Nagli, Kodra, and Varai. After liberation from Portuguese rule in 1954, Dadra and Nagar Haveli was integrated into the Union of India under the Constitution (Tenth Amendment) Act, 1961 and became a Union Territory on 10.08.1961. Following a land survey, the Indian administration recorded the appellants' land holdings in revenue registers. The Collector, by order dated 24.09.1965, sanctioned mutation of Alvara lands in favour of family members pursuant to a partition deed. However, on 28.10.1969, the Collector issued orders rescinding the grants on grounds of alleged breach of conditions under Article 12 of the OA. The appellants challenged the Collector's order before the High Court through writ petitions, contending that they were denied an opportunity of being heard. Meanwhile, the President of India promulgated the Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 on 08.12.1971, providing for abolition of Alvara and Terem tenures, conferring occupancy rights, imposing ceiling, and regulating landlord-tenant relations. The provided judgment text is incomplete and does not include the High Court's detailed findings or the Supreme Court's analysis, final decision, or operative directions. Therefore, the ultimate outcome of the appeals cannot be stated based on the excerpt available.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Emphyteusis and Alvara Grants - Nature of Rights - Portuguese Civil Code, 1867, Decree No. 3602 of 1917, Government Regulation No. 985 (Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli), 1919 - Alvara grants were conferred as perpetual lease rights under Portuguese administration between 1923 and 1930, subject to payment of fixed assessment (land revenue); these rights were expressly transferable, inheritable and capable of partition, and recognized by subsequent Indian administration. (Paras 4.1-4.5)

B) Administrative Law - Rescission of Land Grants - Grounds for Rescission - Government Regulation No. 985 (Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli), 1919, Article 12 - Article 12 empowered the Administration to rescind a contract of concession without indemnity and without formal procedure if agricultural works were not started within one year, if one-fourth of cultivable land was not brought under regular cultivation within two years, or if annual incremental cultivation obligations were not met; Collector issued rescission order dated 28.10.1969 on grounds of alleged breach of these conditions. (Paras 4.8, 4.13)

C) Constitutional Law - Integration of Union Territory - Constitutional Status - Constitution (Tenth Amendment) Act, 1961, Constitution of India, Article 240 - Dadra and Nagar Haveli was liberated from Portuguese domination in 1954 and integrated into Union of India as a Union Territory with effect from 10.08.1961; President promulgated Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 under Article 240. (Paras 4.11, 4.14)

D) Land Reforms - Abolition of Tenures - Effect on Alvara Rights - Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971, Section 4 - The 1971 Regulation provided for abolition of Alvara and Terem tenures, conferment of occupancy rights on holders and tenants, imposition of ceiling on agricultural land, acquisition and distribution of excess land, and regulation of landlord-tenant relations. (Para 4.14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Collector's order dated 28.10.1969 rescinding Alvara grants under Article 12 of the Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli was valid; whether Alvara holders were entitled to hearing before rescission; interpretation of Portuguese-era legal provisions governing emphyteusis and Alvara rights; effect of Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 on pending disputes

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Not mentioned in provided text; the judgment excerpt ends before the final reasoning and operative directions.

Law Points

  • Portuguese Civil Code
  • 1867 governed contracts of emphyteusis
  • Decree No. 3602 of 1917 regulated land grants in Portuguese territories
  • Government Regulation No. 985 (Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli
  • 1919) provided for Alvara grants as perpetual
  • transferable
  • inheritable tenures subject to cultivation conditions
  • Article 12 of OA permitted rescission without indemnity for failure to cultivate
  • Article 7 of OA incorporated Portuguese Civil Code provisions with modifications
  • Article 8 prescribed payment of emphyteutic pensions
  • Article 11 allowed transfer and mortgage of beneficial ownership with subrogation of obligations
  • Article 16 provided for removal of building materials after rescission
  • Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation
  • 1971 abolished Alvara and Terem tenures and conferred occupancy rights
  • Constitution (Tenth Amendment) Act
  • 1961 integrated Dadra and Nagar Haveli as Union Territory
  • Article 240 of Constitution empowered President to make regulations for Union Territory
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (09) 53

Civil Appeal No. 1479 of 2006 (with Civil Appeal Nos. 1480-1489 of 2006 and Civil Appeal No. 1181 of 2017)

Surya Kant, J.

2025 INSC 1145

Divya n gnakumari Harisinh Parmar (Dead) and others

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals against common judgment of Bombay High Court in several Second Appeals regarding rescission of Portuguese-era land grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside Collector's order dated 28.10.1969 rescinding Alvara grants and restore their land rights; ultimate remedy before Supreme Court not specified in provided text.

Filing Reason

Collector issued orders rescinding grants on grounds of breach of cultivation conditions under Article 12 of OA; appellants contended denial of opportunity of being heard and challenged validity of rescission.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered common judgment dated 11,15,16,17.02.2005 in several Second Appeals; details of High Court decision not provided in text. Collector had earlier sanctioned mutation on 24.09.1965 but later rescinded grants on 28.10.1969.

Issues

Whether the Collector's order dated 28.10.1969 rescinding Alvara grants under Article 12 of OA was valid without prior hearing Whether Alvara holders had inheritable and transferable rights under Portuguese law Whether the Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 abolished Alvara tenures and affected pending disputes Interpretation of provisions of Organic Structure of Lands of Nagar Haveli (OA) regarding emphyteusis and rescission

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that Alvara rights were perpetual, inheritable, and recognized by both Portuguese and Indian administrations, and that they had cultivated land as required but land quality was poor. Appellants contended that the Collector’s rescission order dated 28.10.1969 was passed without affording them an opportunity of being heard. Union of India/State argued that the grants were rescinded due to breach of conditions under Article 12 of OA for failure to bring land under regular cultivation.

Ratio Decidendi

Not mentioned in provided text; the judgment excerpt does not include the Supreme Court's final legal reasoning.

Judgment Excerpts

all immoveable properties situated at Pragana of Nagar Haveli, which do not belong to either collective bodies or individuals would vest in the domain of the State A contract of concession shall be rescinded without any right for indemnity (compensation) and without any formal procedure The Appellants are descendants of original ‘Alvara’ holders who had been granted land by the erstwhile Portuguese Government under the OA in the territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli during the period between 1923 and 1930.

Procedural History

Portuguese Civil Code, 1867 enforced on 01.07.1870; Decree No. 3602 came into force on 24.11.1917; Government Regulation No. 985 (OA) brought into force on 22.09.1919; Alvara grants made between 1923 and 1930; Dadra and Nagar Haveli liberated in 1954 and integrated as Union Territory on 10.08.1961; Collector sanctioned mutation on 24.09.1965; Collector issued rescission orders on 28.10.1969; Appellants filed writ petitions challenging rescission; President promulgated Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971 on 08.12.1971; High Court of Judicature at Bombay delivered common judgment dated 11,15,16,17.02.2005; Civil appeals filed before Supreme Court and heard in 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Portuguese Civil Code, 1867: Articles 880, 887
  • Decree No. 3602 Regimen for the Grants of the Lands of the State of India (1917 Law):
  • Government Regulation No. 985 Organic Structure of the Lands of Nagar Haveli (OA), 1919: Articles 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 16
  • Dadra and Nagar Haveli Land Reforms Regulation, 1971: Section 4
  • Constitution of India: Article 240
  • Constitution (Tenth Amendment) Act, 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Common Judgment of Bombay High Court Concerning Rescission of Portuguese-Era Alvara Land Grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Dispute Centered on Whether Collector Validly Rescinded Grants Under Article 12 of Or...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows NIA Appeal Under Section 21(1) of NIA Act, 2008 Against Rejection of Tender of Pardon Under Section 306 CrPC — Held That Order Rejecting Pardon Application Is Not Interlocutory and Is Appealable.