Supreme Court Reviews Accrual of Income Under Income-tax Act, 1922 for Part B State Assessee. The core legal question is whether profits of a selling agent based in a Part B State accrue in that state or in taxable territory where goods are manufactured and shipped.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore appealed against the decision of the High Court in favour of the assessee, Union of Tile Exports, Bangalore. The assessee firm carried on business at Bangalore, then a Part B State, and was appointed sole selling agent for tiles manufactured at Feroke in British India. The agreement with the purchaser at Colombo was entered into at Bangalore. Goods were sold F.O.B. Beypore Port, with chartering and loading supervised by the assessee’s employee at Calicut. Bills of lading were obtained at Beypore and sent to Bangalore, where the assessee handed over shipping documents to a bank and received payments under letters of credit opened by the Ceylon purchaser. For assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53, and 1953-54, the assessee claimed that the entire income accrued in the Part B State and sought the benefit of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950. The Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Tribunal rejected the claim, holding that a part of the profits accrued in taxable territory. On reference, the High Court reversed, holding that the profits were received in the Part B State and the concession was available. The Commissioner appealed to the Supreme Court. The central issue was whether, on the facts, the income could be said to accrue or arise in a Part B State under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether the assessee was entitled to the concession under the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950, or whether profits had to be apportioned under section 42(3) of the Act. The judgment of the Supreme Court is not available from the provided text, and its ultimate decision remains not mentioned.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Accrual of Income - Place of Accrual - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 4(1)(a) - Assessee firm having registered office in Part B State entered into agency agreement in Bangalore and received payments through Bangalore bank, but manufacturing and shipment occurred in taxable territory - Issue of whether entire income accrued in Part B State for purpose of concession under Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 - Held: Not mentioned (Paras Not mentioned).

B) Income Tax - Tax Concession - Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 - Apportionment of Profits - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 42(3) - Business operations partly in taxable territory led to question of apportionment of profits between Part B State and taxable territory - Held: Not mentioned (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Place of accrual of income and entitlement to tax concession under Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 when business operations partly in taxable territory

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • accrual of income
  • place of accrual
  • Part B State
  • taxation concession
  • apportionment of profits
  • selling agent
  • F.O.B. contract
  • letter of credit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1968 LawText (SC) (09) 13

1968-09-10

A.N. Grover, J.C. Shah, V. Ramaswami

1969 AIR 299, 1969 SCR (2) 55

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore

The Union of Tile Exports, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax assessment dispute

Remedy Sought

Assessee claimed concession under Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950, treating entire income as accruing in Part B State

Filing Reason

Income-tax authorities denied the concession, holding that part of profits accrued in taxable territory

Previous Decisions

Income-tax Officer and Appellate Tribunal decided against the assessee; High Court allowed the assessee’s claim and granted concession

Issues

Whether the entire profits of the assessee accrued or arose in a Part B State within the meaning of section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950, and whether profits were liable to apportionment under section 42(3) of the Act

Judgment Excerpts

the assessee claimed that since its registered office was in Bangalore and as the agency agreement with the purchaser at Colombo was entered into in Bangalore the entire income should be treated as income accruing or arising in Part B State

Procedural History

Assessment by Income-tax Officer denied concession; appeal to Appellate Tribunal dismissed; reference to High Court allowed assessee’s claim; appeal by Commissioner to Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Income-tax Act, 1922: 4(1)(a), 42(3)
  • Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews Accrual of Income Under Income-tax Act, 1922 for Part B State Assessee. The core legal question is whether profits of a selling agent based in a Part B State accrue in that state or in taxable territory where goods are manufactu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Recognition to Schools for Non-Compliance with Teacher Qualification Norms. Education Act and Rules Mandate Qualified Teachers for Recognition and Grant-in-Aid.