Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Whether Income Received by Non-Resident via Cheques Sent by Post Is Taxable in British India. High Court Had Held Post Office as Agent and Income Taxable.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The assessee, a non-resident textile manufacturer with offices at Indore and Bombay, supplied goods to the Indian Stores Department, Government of India, during account years 1942 to 1947. Purchase orders were placed at Indore, then in an Indian State. The Government drew cheques on the Reserve Bank of India, Bombay, in favour of the assessee and posted them to Indore. The assessee deposited the cheques with the Imperial Bank of India, Indore, for realisation from the Reserve Bank. For assessment years 1943-44 to 1948-49, the Income-tax authorities held that the profits were received in British India and taxable under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Appellate Tribunal took the view that payment was received at Indore, outside British India. In reference, the High Court applied Commissioner of Income-tax v. Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. (1954) 25 I.T.R. 547, holding that the cheques were received by the assessee through its agent, the post office, in British India. The High Court further held that the Revenue was entitled to raise this contention for the first time before it. The assessee appealed to the Supreme Court on certificate. The judgment of the Supreme Court is not fully extracted; the available headnote indicates that the High Court's decision was under challenge. The core legal issue was whether the income was received in British India, making it taxable in the hands of a non-resident. The resolution of that issue depended on whether the post office was acting as the agent of the assessee or the Government of India in transmitting the cheques. The final outcome of the appeal is not stated in the provided text.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Taxability of Non-Resident - Section 4(1)(a) Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Assessee, a non-resident manufacturer in Indore, supplied goods to Indian Stores Department; payment by cheques drawn on Reserve Bank, Bombay, sent by post to Indore - Tribunal held payment received at Indore; High Court applied Kirloskar Bros. and held post office was assessee’s agent in British India, so income received there and taxable - Held that Revenue could raise contention for the first time in High Court, and post office was agent of assessee, making income taxable in British India.

B) Income Tax - Receipt of Income - Post Office as Agent - Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 4(1) - Cheques sent by post from British India to non-resident assessee in Indore State - High Court held that by posting cheques, Government of India delivered them to assessee through its agent, the post office, in British India, hence receipt occurred in taxable territory.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the profits of a non-resident assessee in respect of supplies to the Government of India were received in British India through the post office acting as the assessee's agent, and therefore taxable under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Income received by non-resident
  • receipt of cheques through post office
  • post office as agent of assessee or government
  • taxable in British India
  • section 4(1)(a) of Indian Income-tax Act
  • 1922
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1965 LawText (SC) (11) 36

1965-11-19

R.S. Bachawat, A.K. Sarkar, J.R. Mudholkar

1966 AIR 1466, (1966) 2 SCR 651

Indore Malwa United Mills

Commissioner of Income-tax, (Central) Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax assessment dispute regarding taxability of profits of a non-resident assessee under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

Remedy Sought

The assessee sought to have the profits treated as not received in British India and thus not taxable.

Filing Reason

The Income-tax authorities sought to tax the profits under section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, claiming they were received in British India.

Previous Decisions

The departmental authorities held payment received at Bombay; the Appellate Tribunal held it received at Indore; the High Court held it received in British India through post office as agent.

Issues

Whether the receipt of cheques by post in Indore constituted receipt of income in British India. Whether the post office was the agent of the assessee for receipt of the cheques. Whether the Revenue could raise the contention about the post office as agent for the first time in the High Court.

Procedural History

The assessee, a non-resident company, filed returns for assessment years 1943-44 to 1948-49. The Income Tax Officer held that the income was received in British India. On appeal, the Appellate Tribunal held the payment was received at Indore. The Department appealed to the High Court, which reversed, holding the income taxable in British India as the post office was the agent of the assessee. The assessee appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Income-tax Act, 1922: 4(1), 4(1)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings — Held That Recovery Officer Has Power to Attach Property Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Whether Income Received by Non-Resident via Cheques Sent by Post Is Taxable in British India. High Court Had Held Post Office as Agent and Income Taxable.