Supreme Court Grants Special Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute Concerning Notification Under Section 4. Available Extract Records No Final Legal Finding or Operative Direction Beyond Grant of Leave.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India heard a matter involving the Agricultural Produce Market Committee as petitioner and the Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commissioner as respondents. The bench comprised K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik. After leave was granted, the Court heard learned counsel on both sides. The matter concerned a notification under Section 4, but the available judgment extract ends without further details on the factual background, arguments, analysis, or final order. No additional information is provided in the text.

Issue of Consideration

15042

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal and heard learned counsel on both sides. The available judgment extract does not record the final operative order beyond the grant of leave.

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (09) 57

1996-09-23

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

K.M. Reddy, N.D.B. Raju, G. Prabhakar, M. Veerappa, Ranjit Kumar, P. Mahale, K.K. Gupta

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee by its Secretary

The Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commissioner & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Land acquisition dispute involving notification under Section 4

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides. Notification under Section 4

Procedural History

The matter was before the Supreme Court; leave was granted; counsel for both sides heard; no further procedural history is available in the provided extract.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Against NCLAT Order Dismissing Company Petition for Oppression and Mismanagement. NCLAT Had Held NCLT Lacked Jurisdiction to Decide Fraud and Coercion in Summary Proceedings, Directing Civil Suit Under Sections 31 an...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers ...