Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Market Committee in Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act Notified Area Dispute. Saharatikira and Bheden Villages Held Within 8 km Radius of Notified Market Area Under Section 4(1) of Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956, Making Paddy Purchasers Liable for Market Fee.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India decided an appeal arising from a special leave petition filed by M/s. Attabira Regulated Market Committee against M/s. Ganesh Rice Mills regarding the liability to pay market fee under the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956. The respondent had filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa (OJC No. 2337/85) challenging the demand for market fee on paddy purchased from villages Saharatikira and Bheden. The High Court by order dated March 21, 1991, ruled in favour of the respondent, which prompted the appellant Market Committee to approach the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted leave and proceeded to hear the appeal. Notice was sent to the respondent on April 14, 1992, but neither acknowledgement nor unserved envelope was received, so notice was deemed served. The sole question before the court was whether Saharatikira and Bheden were within the notified market area of the appellant. The court examined the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956 (Orissa Act 3 of 1963). The notification declared the notified market area with annexures. Annexure 'A' stated that the area falling within a radius of 8 kms from the plots specified in Schedule B were within the notified area. Schedule B mentioned that the area comprising Attabira and Bheden Police Stations in the District of Sambalpur were within the notified area. The court found that the villages Saharatikira and Bheden were situated within the 8 kms radius from the aforesaid police stations. Therefore, the villages fell within the notified area. The respondent admittedly was doing purchase of paddy from the notified area. Consequently, the respondent was required to pay market fee under the Act. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order dated March 21, 1991 in OJC No. 2337/85, and held that the respondent was liable to pay market fee. No costs were awarded. A separate special leave petition, SLP (C) No. 2092 of 1992, was dismissed as withdrawn.

Headnote

A) Agricultural Market Law - Notified Market Area - Inclusion of Villages Within 8 km Radius - Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956, Section 4(1) - The dispute concerned whether Saharatikira and Bheden villages were within the notified market area under the notification issued pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Act. The court observed that the notification stated that the area falling within a radius of 8 kms from the plots specified in Schedule B were within the notified area, and Schedule B mentioned Attabira and Bheden Police Stations in Sambalpur district. Since the villages were situated within that 8 km radius and the respondent was purchasing paddy from the notified area, the court held that the villages fell within the notified area and the respondent was liable to pay market fee under the Act. (No paragraph numbers in judgment)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Saharatikira and Bheden are within the notified market area of the appellant under Section 4(1) of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed; High Court order dated 21.03.1991 in OJC No.2337/85 set aside; respondents liable to pay market fee under Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956; no costs; separate SLP(C) No.2092/1992 dismissed as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Villages within 8 km radius of notified market area are within notified area
  • purchaser of agricultural produce from notified area liable to pay market fee
  • notification under Section 4(1) of Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act
  • 1956 determines notified market area
  • service of notice deemed served if no acknowledgement or unserved envelope received
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (05) 36

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 2092 of 1992

1996-05-10

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

JT 1996 (6) 360, 1996 SCALE (5) 288

M/S. Attabira Regulated Market Committee

M/S. Ganesh Rice Mills

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal arising from Special Leave Petition against High Court order concerning liability to pay market fee under Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

Appellant Market Committee sought to set aside High Court order dated March 21, 1991 in OJC No. 2337/85 and require respondent to pay market fee on paddy purchased from notified area.

Filing Reason

Dispute whether villages Saharatikira and Bheden were within the notified market area of the appellant committee as declared under Section 4(1) of the Act.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Orissa in OJC No. 2337/85 dated March 21, 1991 decided in favour of respondent, which was set aside by Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether Saharatikira and Bheden are within the notified market area of the appellant under Section 4(1) of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the notification under Section 4(1) declared the notified market area with annexures; Annexure A specified 8 km radius from plots in Schedule B, and Schedule B included Attabira and Bheden Police Stations; therefore villages within that radius and respondent's paddy purchases from the area attract market fee. Respondent was deemed served but did not appear; no contrary submission recorded.

Ratio Decidendi

When a notification under Section 4(1) of Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956 declares a notified market area comprising an 8 km radius from plots specified in Schedule B, villages situated within that radius fall within the notified area, and purchasers of agricultural produce from such villages are liable to pay market fee.

Judgment Excerpts

The only question is: whether Saharatikira and Bheden are within the notified market area of the appellant? Under annexure 'A' to the notification it was stated that the area falling within a radius of 8 kms. from the plots specified in Schedule B are within the notified area. In schedule B it was mentioned that the area comprising in Attabira and Bheden Police Station in the District of Sambalpur are within the notified area. Under these circumstances, the villages do fall within the notified area. Consequently, they shall be required to pay market fee under the Act.

Procedural History

Respondent filed OJC No.2337/85 before High Court of Orissa challenging market fee demand; High Court allowed writ on 21.03.1991; appellant filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2092 of 1992; leave granted and appeal heard; notice to respondent deemed served on 14.04.1992 as no acknowledgement or unserved envelope received; Supreme Court allowed appeal and set aside High Court order.

Acts & Sections

  • Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956 (Orissa Act 3 of 1963): Section 4(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Cheque Drawn on Syndicate Bank After Merger with Canara Bank Attracts Liability Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. Petition Under Section 482 CrPC and Section 528 BNSS Seeks Quashing of Private Comp...