Supreme Court Allows Assessee in Sales Tax Exemption Case; Holds Word 'Papad' in Notification Is Genus Covering Gole Papad Made from Maida. Interpretation Under Section 4(2) of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 Favors Exemption for All Varieties of Papad Without Differentiation by Shape or Ingredient.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerned a claim for sales tax exemption on a product known as Gole Papad under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The appellant, a manufacturer/dealer, sought exemption under a notification issued by the State Government under Section 4(2) of that Act. The respondent was the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Jaipur. By notification dated March 9, 1970, the State exempted "Papad and Badi i.e. Mangori" from sales tax. The appellant made an application for exemption of Gole Papad manufactured out of Maida, Salt Starch, Papad Soda, Alum and Food colour. The Additional Commissioner, by proceeding dated August 27, 1982, held that Gole Papad was not covered by the notification. On appeal, the Sales Tax Tribunal by order dated March 17, 1986 allowed the appeal and held that the notification would govern all varieties of Papad, whether circular or flat in shape, consisting of all ingredients whether pulses, rice, maida etc. The State carried the matter in revision, and the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the revision on April 18, 1991, holding that the appellant was not entitled to the exemption. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court by special leave. The core question was whether Gole Papad manufactured from maida and other ingredients fell within the meaning of "Papad" in the exemption notification, or whether the word "Papad" had to be restricted to papad made exclusively from pulses or certain traditional ingredients. The appellant contended that the notification exempting "Papad and Badi i.e. Mangori" did not differentiate between gole or flat papad or between ingredients and must cover all varieties of papad. The State contended that the Gole Papad was not covered by the notification, relying on the High Court's interpretation. The Supreme Court observed that the notification clearly mentioned that the word "Papad" had been used as a genus and its species are made from pulses, rice, maida, potato, sago etc. It noted that in the notification the words "Papad and Badi i.e. Mangori" had been used, and by analogy with entry No.3 which included "other stationery articles made of handmade paper", the entries were not restricted to only specific items but encompassed the general category. The Court posed the question whether the ingredients of papad are exclusively composed of pulses or maida or rice etc. It held that when the notification mentioned papad and Badi i.e. Mangori, it did not intend to differentiate between gole or flat papad made of any ingredient. The High Court's interpretation was therefore incorrect and the Tribunal's interpretation was correct. The appeal was allowed. The Court directed no costs. It further observed that if there was any difficulty, it would be open to the Government to make necessary declaration in the exemption notification itself by way of amendment.

Headnote

A) Sales Tax - Exemption Notification Interpretation - Word 'Papad' as Genus - Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, Section 4(2) - The notification dated 09.03.1970 exempted 'Papad and Badi i.e. Mangori' from sales tax and used 'Papad' as a genus whose species are made from pulses, rice, maida, potato, sago etc. The assessing authority denied exemption to 'Gole Papad' made from maida, salt starch, papad soda, alum and food colour on the ground it was not covered. The Supreme Court held that the notification did not intend to differentiate between gole or flat papad based on shape or ingredient, and all varieties of papad including gole papad made from maida were exempt; the High Court's interpretation was incorrect and the Tribunal's correct.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether 'Gole Papad' manufactured out of maida, salt starch, papad soda, alum and food colour is covered by the exemption notification dated March 9, 1970 issued under Section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The Supreme Court held that the word 'Papad' in the notification is a genus and no differentiation between gole or flat papad or ingredient was intended. The High Court's interpretation was incorrect and the Tribunal's was correct. No costs. The Government may amend the exemption notification if any difficulty arises.

Law Points

  • The word 'Papad' in the exemption notification is used as a genus with species made from pulses
  • rice
  • maida
  • potato
  • sago etc.
  • the notification does not differentiate between gole or flat papad based on shape or ingredient
  • all varieties of papad including gole papad made from maida are exempt from sales tax under the notification.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (05) 25

1996-05-10

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

K.K. Jain, Ajay K. Jain, Shashi Bhushan, Pramod Dayal, Aruneshwar Gupta

M/s. Shiv Shakti Gol Finger

Asstt. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Jaipur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by special leave against High Court order denying sales tax exemption to Gole Papad.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought exemption from sales tax for Gole Papad manufactured out of maida, salt starch, papad soda, alum and food colour under notification dated 09.03.1970.

Filing Reason

Additional Commissioner held Gole Papad not covered by exemption; Sales Tax Tribunal allowed appeal; High Court reversed and denied exemption; hence appeal to Supreme Court.

Previous Decisions

Additional Commissioner rejected claim on 27.08.1982; Sales Tax Tribunal allowed appeal on 17.03.1986; High Court allowed State's revision on 18.04.1991 and denied exemption.

Issues

Whether 'Gole Papad' manufactured from maida, salt starch, papad soda, alum and food colour is covered by the exemption notification dated 09.03.1970 issued under Section 4(2) of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. Whether the word 'Papad' in the notification is a genus covering all varieties irrespective of shape and ingredient.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the notification exempting 'Papad and Badi i.e. Mangori' must cover all varieties of papad including gole papad regardless of shape or ingredient, as the word 'Papad' is used as a genus. Respondent-State contended that the assessee was not entitled to exemption, supporting the Additional Commissioner's view that Gole Papad was not covered by the notification.

Ratio Decidendi

The word 'Papad' in the exemption notification is used as a genus, and its species are made from pulses, rice, maida, potato, sago etc. The notification does not differentiate between gole or flat papad made of any ingredient. Therefore, all varieties of papad, including gole papad made from maida, are exempt from sales tax under the notification.

Judgment Excerpts

The notification clearly mentions that the word 'Papad' has been used a genus and its species are made from pulses, rice, maida, potato, sago etc. When the notification mentions papad and Badi, i.e. Mangori it would appear that they did not intend to differentiate between gole or flat papad made of any ingredient. Under those circumstances it appears that the interpretation given by the High Court is not correct and that of Tribunal is correct. The appeal is allowed and if there is any difficulty it would be open to the Govt. to make necessary declaration in exemption notification itself by way of amendment.

Procedural History

The Additional Commissioner, by order dated 27.08.1982, rejected the appellant's claim for exemption. On appeal, the Sales Tax Tribunal by order dated 17.03.1986 allowed the appeal and held that the notification covered all varieties of papad. The State filed a revision before the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, which by order dated 18.04.1991 in Sales Tax Revision No. 110 of 1987 allowed the revision and held that the appellant was not entitled to exemption. The appellant then filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court, which granted leave and heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954: Section 4(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Corrigendum Allowing Multiple Cooperative Societies in One Revenue Village. The Court upheld the State Government's authority to amend its policy to permit more than one Primary Agricultura...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Sudden Quarrel Case. Conviction Under Section 304 Part I Read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Replaces Section 302/34 Conviction, Based on Evidenc...