Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Equal Pay Claim; Upholds Date Fixed by Anomaly Committee as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14. Pay Scale Revision Effective November 7, 1994 Upheld for Urban Local Body Employees Claiming Parity with Medical Officers.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a claim by employees of urban local bodies who sought equal pay on par with Medical Officers at the scale of Rs.2200-4000. The petitioners approached the High Court by way of a writ petition seeking direction for payment of that scale. There was a long controversy regarding their entitlement, which was ultimately referred to an Anomaly Committee. The Committee, in its proceedings dated January 1, 1995, accepted new pay scales for different posts in urban local bodies and recommended that persons like the petitioners be paid the scale of Rs.2200-4000 with effect from November 7, 1994. The Government accepted that recommendation and issued orders on February 16, 1995. The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking payment of arrears from 1986. Initially, directions were given by the Court to consider why they were not being paid from January 1, 1986. After consideration, the respondent filed an affidavit explaining circumstances, one of which was that previously the petitioners were unequals and were not being paid the same pay, hence they were not entitled to the same scale. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the petition on September 21, 1995. In the Supreme Court, the petitioners contended that the reason given by the respondents was not relevant since the Anomaly Committee had found that they were performing the same duties as Medical Officers, and therefore they should be granted the scale from 1986. The Supreme Court observed that the reasons in the counter-affidavit may not be correct, but the Anomaly Committee had recommended payment of the same scale with effect from November 7, 1994. The legal question was whether the date fixed was arbitrary. The Court reiterated that fixing a date is not arbitrary violating Article 14, but authorities cannot pick a date arbitrarily. Since the question was referred to the Anomaly Committee to advise the Government, and the Committee had gone into the question and recommended the scale and the date, and the Government accepted it, the Court held that the fixation of the date was not arbitrary. Accordingly, the special leave petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Equal Pay - Date of Effect of Pay Scale Revision - Constitution of India, Article 14 - Petitioners sought equal pay with Medical Officers from 1986; Anomaly Committee recommended pay scale of Rs.2200-4000 effective November 7, 1994, and Government accepted it - Supreme Court held that fixation of a date is not arbitrary if based on recommendation of expert body; the Committee had gone into the question and recommended the date; Government accepted; hence no violation of Article 14 - Held that the special leave petition was dismissed.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the date fixed by the Anomaly Committee (November 7, 1994) for granting the higher pay scale to the petitioners was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Special leave petition dismissed; the fixation of date November 7, 1994 for grant of pay scale was upheld as not arbitrary under Article 14.

Law Points

  • Fixation of date for granting revised pay scale is not arbitrary if based on expert committee recommendation and accepted by government
  • equal pay for equal work
  • Article 14 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (01) 32

1996-01-29

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

JT 1996 (2) 472, 1996 SCALE (2) 210

Dr. P.N. Puri & Ors.

State of U.P. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking equal pay with Medical Officers and arrears from 1986

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction for payment of equal pay scale of Rs.2200-4000 with effect from 1986

Filing Reason

Government granted pay scale only from November 7, 1994 based on Anomaly Committee recommendation; petitioners claimed arrears from 1986

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed the writ petition on September 21, 1995; earlier Anomaly Committee recommended pay scale effective November 7, 1994; Government accepted on February 16, 1995

Issues

Whether the date fixed by the Anomaly Committee for granting the revised pay scale was arbitrary and violated Article 14 of the Constitution

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that the Anomaly Committee found they performed same duties as Medical Officers, so they should get scale from 1986; reasons in counter-affidavit about previous inequality were not relevant. Respondents contended that the date fixed based on Anomaly Committee recommendation was valid and not arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi

Fixation of a date for giving effect to a pay scale revision is not arbitrary if it is based on the recommendation of an expert body like the Anomaly Committee and accepted by the Government; such fixation does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

It is well settled law that fixing a date is not arbitrary violating Article 14. It is settled law that the authorities cannot pick up from their hat and fix a date. The Committee had gone into the question and recommended the scale of pay of Rs.2200-4000/- to the persons like the petitioners and also recommended to give effect from the date on which they had decided, namely November 7, 1994. Under those circumstances, it cannot be said that fixation of date is arbitrary violating Article 14.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed writ petition in High Court for equal pay; matter referred to Anomaly Committee; Committee recommended pay scale effective November 7, 1994; Government accepted on February 16, 1995; High Court dismissed writ petition on September 21, 1995; petitioners filed special leave petition in Supreme Court; Supreme Court dismissed it.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to FCRA Provisions on Political Nature Declaration. Right to Receive Foreign Contribution Not a Fundamental Right Under Article 19; Guidelines in Rule 3 Not Vague or Arbitrary.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.