Supreme Court Considers Validity of Rule 9 of Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919 in Distillery Establishment Charges Dispute. Appeal Challenges High Court Decision Upholding Demand for Excise Staff Costs from Licensees Manufacturing Denatured and Potable Liquor Under Bihar Excise Act, 1915.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

These civil appeals arose from special leave against a common judgment of a Division Bench of the Patna High Court dismissing three writ petitions. The appellants were distillery licensees under the Bihar Excise Act, 1915; the respondents were the State of Bihar and excise authorities. The dispute concerned demands for establishment charges under Rule 9 of the Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919, which required distilleries licensed solely for manufacture of denatured spirit or other commercial spirit to bear the whole cost of excise staff posted for supervision. The appellant in Civil Appeal Nos.4762-63 of 1996 held licences for two distilleries at Lauriya and Mirganj in Bihar, under Forms 19, 19-A, 25, 27, 28, and 28-A, covering compounding and blending foreign liquor, sacramental wine, denatured spirit, wholesale country spirit, and manufacture of spirit for chemical and industrial purposes. Forms 27 and 28 were withdrawn from 1 April 1979. The Superintendent of Excise directed payment of Rs.1,68,128.77 towards establishment charges for excise staff at Lauriya from March 1973 to July 1979 and at Mirganj for 1975-76 to 1978-79. The appellant in Civil Appeal No.4764 of 1996 operated a distillery at Sultanganj, Bhagalpur, manufacturing country spirit under Forms 25, 27, 28, and 28-A, and challenged a demand memorandum dated 5 November 1976 and orders of the Commissioner of Excise dated 27 September 1978 and Member, Board of Revenue dated 27 December 1979. Before the High Court, appellants argued that Rule 9 was ultra vires the Bihar Excise Act and, alternatively, did not apply to composite distilleries manufacturing both denatured/industrial spirit and potable liquor. The High Court rejected the ultra vires contention, held Rule 9 not beyond the Act, but did not render a clear finding on the alternative applicability contention, and dismissed the writ petitions. Before the Supreme Court, the appellants reiterated that Rule 9 lacked statutory basis and on its express language could not apply to their distilleries because they were not licensed solely for denatured or commercial spirit. Respondents argued Rule 9 was sustainable under Section 38 of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 and was framed under Section 90 rule-making power to prevent illegal conversion of denatured spirit into potable liquor and to protect public interest. Respondents further submitted that the words 'denatured spirit or any other commercial spirit' should be read as 'denatured spirit and any other commercial spirit' to include all potable spirit sold commercially. The Supreme Court identified two points for determination: first, whether Rule 9 was ultra vires; second, whether the second part of Rule 9 applied to distilleries manufacturing denatured/industrial spirit as well as potable liquor. The court noted the statutory scheme: Section 2 definitions of liquor, spirit, intoxicant, and denatured spirit; Section 13 licensing manufacture of intoxicants; Section 15 establishment of distilleries; Section 22 exclusive privilege; Section 27 excise duty; and Section 38 fees and conditions for licences. It observed that a conjoint reading of Section 38(1)(a)(ii), Section 13, and Section 15 showed licences could be subject to restrictions and conditions as the Board directed. The court also traced the rule-making power under Section 90 and the 1930 amendment adding the second part to Rule 9. The available excerpt concluded before final decision, so the final holding and directions were not provided.

Headnote

A) Excise Law - Delegated Legislation - Validity of Rule 9 of Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919 - Bihar Excise Act, 1915, Sections 38, 90 - Appellants contended that Rule 9 lacked statutory basis. The court examined that Section 38(1)(a)(ii) permits licences to be subject to restrictions and conditions as the Board directs and Section 90 empowers the Board to make rules for regulation, inspection, supervision, management, and control of any place for manufacture of intoxicants. Rule 9 as amended in 1930 required distillers licensed solely for denatured or commercial spirit to bear the whole cost of excise staff for proper supervision. The court was analyzing whether the rule traced its origin to statutory provisions.

B) Excise Law - Statutory Interpretation - Scope of 'denatured spirit or any other commercial spirit' - Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919, Rule 9 - Appellants argued that composite distilleries manufacturing potable liquor were outside the second part of Rule 9. Respondents argued that 'or' could be read as 'and' to include all commercial spirit including potable liquor. The court considered definitions of spirit, liquor, and intoxicant under Bihar Excise Act, 1915 and the text of Rule 9.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Rule 9 of Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919 is ultra vires the Bihar Excise Act, 1915; and whether the second part of Rule 9 imposing establishment costs applies to distilleries manufacturing not only denatured spirit and spirit for industrial use but also potable liquor for human consumption.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Final decision of the Supreme Court was not contained in the available text; the High Court had dismissed the writ petitions and the Supreme Court was considering the two points for determination.

Law Points

  • Rule 9 of Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules
  • 1919 requires a distiller licensed solely for manufacture of denatured spirit or any other commercial spirit to bear the whole cost of excise staff for proper supervision
  • Section 38 of Bihar Excise Act
  • 1915 enables licences to be granted subject to restrictions and conditions as the Board directs
  • Section 90 of Bihar Excise Act
  • 1915 empowers the Board to make rules for regulation
  • inspection
  • supervision
  • management and control of any place for manufacture of intoxicants
  • Definition of spirit includes any liquor containing alcohol obtained by distillation whether denatured or not
  • Definition of intoxicant includes any liquor or substance from which liquor may be distilled declared by State Government
  • Section 13 of Bihar Excise Act
  • 1915 requires licence for manufacturing intoxicants
  • Section 15 of Bihar Excise Act
  • 1915 authorises establishment of distilleries under licence granted under Section 13
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (08) 100

Civil Appeal Nos.4762-63 of 1996 and Civil Appeal No.4764 of 1996

1996-08-14

S.B. Majmudar, S.P. Bharucha

JT 1996 (7) 322, 1996 SCALE (6)17

Shree Krishna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd. / M/s Arun Chemical Industrie

State of Bihar & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of Constitution before Patna High Court challenging excise establishment charges and validity of Rule 9; civil appeals by special leave before Supreme Court.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought quashing of demands for establishment charges and orders of excise authorities; declaration that Rule 9 of Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919 is ultra vires and inapplicable to their distilleries.

Filing Reason

Superintendent of Excise raised demands under Rule 9 for costs of excise staff posted at distilleries for supervision; appellants challenged the demands and the rule.

Previous Decisions

Patna High Court by common judgment dismissed all three writ petitions; held Rule 9 was not ultra vires the Bihar Excise Act; no clear finding on alternative applicability to composite distilleries.

Issues

Whether Rule 9 of the Rules is ultra vires the provisions of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915? Whether the second part of Rule 9 imposing establishment costs on the distilleries, on its express language, applies to the distilleries run by the appellants for manufacturing not only denatured spirit and spirit for industrial use but also for manufacturing potable liquor for human consumption?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants contended that Rule 9 was beyond the scope of the Bihar Excise Act and had no statutory provision to sustain it. Appellants alternatively contended that because their distilleries manufactured potable liquor in addition to denatured and industrial spirit, Rule 9 on its express language could not be applied to them. Respondents submitted that Rule 9 was sustainable under Section 38 of the Act and was enacted to prevent illegal conversion of denatured spirit into potable liquor, thereby serving public purpose. Respondents argued that the words 'denatured spirit or any other commercial spirit' in Rule 9 should be read as 'denatured spirit and any other commercial spirit' to include all potable spirit sold commercially.

Ratio Decidendi

The excerpt indicates that the court was considering whether Rule 9 traced its origin to Section 38 and Section 90 of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915; Section 38(1)(a)(ii) permits licences to be subject to restrictions and conditions as the Board directs, and Section 90 empowers rule-making for supervision and control of places manufacturing intoxicants. No final ratio decidendi was stated in the available portion.

Judgment Excerpts

9. The Commissioner shall appoint such officers and establishment as he thinks fit to the charge of a distillery. In the case of a distiller licensed solely for the purpose of the manufacture of denatured spirit or any other commercial spirit, the distiller shall bear the whole cost including leave and pension contributions and cost of uniform of such excise staff and establishment as may be considered necessary by the Excise Commissioner for proper supervision. 38. Fees for terms, conditions, and form of, and duration of, licences, permits and passes. - (1) Every licence, permit o pass granted under this Act- (a) shall be granted - (i) on payment of such fees (if any), and (ii) subject to such restrictions and on such conditions, and (b) shall be in such form and contain such particulars, as the Board may direct. (2) Every licence, permit or pass under this Act shall be granted for such period (if any) as may be prescribed by rule made by the State Government under section 89, clause (e). Points for determination: 1. Whether Rule 9 of the Rules is ultra vires the provisions of the Act? 2. In the alternative whether the second part of Rule 9 imposing establishment costs on the distilleries, on its express language, applies to the distilleries run by the appellants for manufacturing not only denatured spirit and spirit for industrial use but also for manufacturing potable liquor for human consumption?

Procedural History

Licences granted under Bihar Excise Act, 1915; demands for establishment charges made between 1976 and 1979; appellants filed writ petitions before Patna High Court; High Court dismissed writ petitions by common judgment; appellants obtained special leave; Supreme Court heard civil appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Bihar Excise Act, 1915: Section 2 clauses (2), (6), (6a), (12a), (14), (19); Section 5(b); Section 13; Section 15; Section 22; Section 27; Section 38; Section 49; Section 90
  • Bihar & Orissa Excise Rules, 1919: Rule 9
  • Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Postal Department in Promotion Dispute — Merit List Division-Specific, Not Common Across Divisions. The Court held that the respondent, an Extra Departmental Delivery Agent from Banda Division, was not entitled to pro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Permitting Deposit of Costs in Suit for Possession — Payment into Court Instead of Directly to Plaintiff Held Valid Compliance with Conditional Decree. The court held that under Order XXI Rule 1(1)...