Supreme Court Upholds High Court Direction to Identify Vacancies for Waitlisted Assistant Engineer Candidates and Dismisses Appeals by Both Sides. 200 Posts for Rural Engineering Organization Must Be Filled by Direct Recruitment Through Public Service Commission; Government Directed to Make Fresh Exercise to Identify Vacancies or Report to High Court.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed before the Patna High Court by an association of unemployed civil engineers and individual petitioners seeking appointment to Assistant Engineer (Civil) posts from a waiting list recommended by the Public Service Commission. The High Court by order dated November 21, 1995 in CWJC Nos. 2093/89 and 3072/90 directed the State Government to identify vacancies existing as on December 31, 1987 and available for appointment from the waiting list. The High Court also held that 200 posts earmarked by the Government in its resolution dated June 16, 1987 were intended for the Rural Engineering Organization and not for the Road/Building Construction and Public Works Department, hence the writ petitioners had no right to those posts. Both the writ petitioners and the State of Bihar appealed to the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court, the writ petitioners contended that since the Public Service Commission had rejected the State Government's request to regularize employees holding those 200 posts, those posts should be made available to waitlisted candidates. The State contended that vacancies meant for general candidates had already been filled and no vacancies existed, and that the court could not direct filling vacancies from a waiting list after one year. The Supreme Court found no force in the writ petitioners' contention regarding the 200 posts, holding that those posts were meant for the Rural Engineering Organization and should be filled by direct recruitment through the Public Service Commission, with employees also eligible to apply. Regarding the High Court's direction to identify vacancies as on December 31, 1987, the Supreme Court upheld it, noting that although ordinarily a court cannot direct filling vacancies from a waiting list after one year, this case warranted an exception because an interim direction keeping the waiting list alive was in operation till disposal of the writ petition. The High Court had found it impossible to record a finding on the number of vacancies from the material on record. The Supreme Court therefore directed the Government to make a fresh exercise to identify whether vacancies meant for general or reserved candidates existed, and if so to fill them from the waiting list; if no vacancies existed, the Government was to place a report before the High Court. The appeals were dismissed with these observations and no costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Waiting List - Validity Beyond One Year - Not mentioned - Court ordinarily cannot direct filling vacancies from waiting list after lapse of one year but exception warranted when interim order kept waiting list alive till disposal of writ petition - High Court direction to identify vacancies existing as on 31.12.1987 and fill from waiting list upheld on peculiar facts - Held that the direction was justified due to continuing interim order.

B) Service Law - Public Employment - Vacancy Identification - Not mentioned - High Court directed State to identify vacancies existing as on 31.12.1987 from waiting list recommended by Public Service Commission for Assistant Engineers (Civil); State contended no vacancies existed and general vacancies already filled; High Court did not accept State's contention - Government directed to make fresh exercise to identify whether vacancies for general or reserved candidates exist and fill from waiting list if identified; if no vacancies, report to High Court - Held that fresh identification exercise is required.

C) Service Law - Direct Recruitment - Rural Engineering Organization Posts - Not mentioned - 200 posts earmarked by Government Resolution dated 16.06.1987 intended for Rural Engineering Organization, not for Road/Building Construction and Public Works Department; Public Service Commission rejected regularization of employees holding those posts - Writ petitioners have no right to those posts from waiting list; those posts to be filled by direct recruitment through Public Service Commission; eligible candidates including employees may apply - Held that waitlisted candidates have no claim to those posts.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in directing the State Government to identify vacancies existing as on 31.12.1987 and fill them from the waiting list recommended by the Public Service Commission for Assistant Engineers (Civil), despite the ordinary rule that waiting list cannot be operated beyond one year; Whether 200 posts earmarked for Rural Engineering Organization in Government Resolution dated 16.06.1987 should be made available to waitlisted candidates after the Public Service Commission rejected regularization of employees holding those posts.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals dismissed. High Court direction to identify vacancies as on 31.12.1987 upheld. Government directed to make fresh exercise to identify whether vacancies for general or reserved candidates exist and fill from waiting list if identified; if no vacancies, place report before High Court. 200 posts for Rural Engineering Organization to be filled by direct recruitment through Public Service Commission; writ petitioners' claim to those posts rejected.

Law Points

  • Court cannot ordinarily direct filling vacancies from waiting list after one year
  • Exception when interim order kept waiting list alive
  • Posts earmarked for Rural Engineering Organization must be filled by direct recruitment through Public Service Commission
  • Government directed to identify vacancies as on 31.12.1987 for filling from waiting list if any
  • If no vacancies report to High Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (04) 161

Civil Appeal Nos.7518-20 of 1996 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 8215-17 of 1996)

1996-04-08

K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik

JT 1996 (5) 367 1996 SCALE (4)167

Gopal Subramaniam

Bihar State Unemployed Civil Engineers Association

State of Bihar and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition before Patna High Court seeking appointment of waitlisted candidates to Assistant Engineer (Civil) posts; appeals before Supreme Court by both writ petitioners and State against different parts of High Court order.

Remedy Sought

Writ petitioners sought direction to appoint them from waiting list to identified vacancies including 200 posts; State sought setting aside of High Court direction to identify vacancies.

Filing Reason

Delay in appointment of waitlisted candidates recommended by Public Service Commission; dispute over availability of vacancies and earmarking of 200 posts for Rural Engineering Organization.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Patna by order dated 21.11.1995 directed identification of vacancies as on 31.12.1987 and held 200 posts for Rural Engineering Organization not available to waitlisted candidates; no appeal before this.

Issues

Whether the High Court was justified in directing the State Government to identify vacancies existing as on 31.12.1987 and fill them from the waiting list despite the rule against operating waiting list beyond one year. Whether 200 posts earmarked by Government Resolution dated 16.06.1987 for Rural Engineering Organization should be made available to waitlisted candidates after Public Service Commission rejected regularization.

Submissions/Arguments

Writ petitioners contended that since Public Service Commission rejected State Government's request to regularize employees holding the 200 posts, those posts should be made available to waitlisted candidates. State contended that vacancies meant for general candidates had already been filled and no vacancies existed as on 31.12.1987, and court cannot direct filling vacancies from waiting list after lapse of one year.

Ratio Decidendi

Ordinarily a court cannot direct filling vacancies from a waiting list after lapse of one year, but when an interim order kept the waiting list alive during pendency, an exception is justified. Posts earmarked for a specific organization must be filled by direct recruitment through Public Service Commission and not from waiting list of another department. Government must make fresh exercise to identify vacancies if material on record is insufficient.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court of Patna in the impugned order dated November 21, 1995 in CWJC Nos. 2093/89 and 3072/90 directed the Government to identify the vacancies existing as on December 31,1987 and available for appointment from among the candidates in the waiting list as recommended by the Public Service Commission to the Assistant Engineers (Civil). It is true that the court cannot give direction to fill up vacancies from the waiting list after the lapse of one year. But in this case, the High Court had given exception to the principle. An interim direction given earlier to keep the waiting list alive was in operation till the disposal of the writ petition. Under those circumstances, it would be for the Government to make afresh exercise to identify whether there exist vacancies meant either for general candidates or for the reserved candidates and, if so, how many of them do exist so as to fill up the vacancies, if so identified, from among the candidates from waiting list If the Government finds that there are no vacancies existing, the Government would place a report in this behalf before the High Court accordingly.

Procedural History

Writ petitions CWJC Nos. 2093/89 and 3072/90 filed before Patna High Court; High Court passed order dated 21.11.1995; both writ petitioners and State of Bihar filed Special Leave Petitions which were converted into Civil Appeal Nos.7518-20 of 1996; Supreme Court condoned delay, granted leave, heard both sides and dismissed appeals.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Landlord in U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1972 — Release Application Takes Priority Over Reallotment. Vacant residential building after joint tenant obtained separate allotment; landlord's ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Refund of Excise Duty on Exported Ship and Aircraft Stores Under Central Excise Rules. Appellant Corporation Claimed No Duty Payable on Export of Light Diesel Oil, Furnace Oil, and Aviation Turbine Fuel from Bonded Stock to For...