Supreme Court Allows Assessees in Special Excise Duty Exemption Case Due to Deemed Clearance on Exempt Date. Goods Manufactured Before 28 February 1988 and Cleared After 1 March 1988 Were Not Liable to Fresh Special Excise Duty Because of Total Exemption Notification on the Last Day of Previous Levy Under Finance Act, 1988 and Central Excise Rules, 1944.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals challenged the correctness of a judgment and order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, which had reversed orders of the Collectors (Appeals) and held that collection of special excise duty on clearances on or after 1st March 1988 of goods manufactured prior to that date was valid. The appellants, M/s Ponds India Ltd. and another assessee, argued that under the principle of the Supreme Court decision in Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., goods manufactured prior to 28 February 1988 and cleared after 1 March 1988 were not liable to the fresh special excise duty levied by the Finance Act, 1988. The Revenue contended that Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules applied, making the rate of duty applicable on the date of actual removal, which was after 1 March 1988 when the new levy was in force. The Supreme Court analyzed the annual nature of special excise duty under the Finance Acts, noting that the levy attaches to goods at the time of manufacture, but payment is deferred to the date of clearance. The court further held that where goods have been manufactured while the levy is operative and have not been cleared until the last date of that levy, the goods must be deemed to have been removed on that last date. In the present case, the last date of the previous levy was 28 February 1988, on which date a notification under Rule 8 had wholly exempted the goods from special excise duty. Therefore, the appellants were not liable to pay any special excise duty on the goods cleared after 1 March 1988. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that the new levy under the Finance Act, 1988 could apply, holding that it was a new levy under a different statute and distinct from the previous levy, and Rule 9A did not operate in such circumstances. The appeals were allowed, the Tribunal's order was set aside insofar as it related to the two appellants, and no order was made as to costs.

Headnote

A) Excise Duty - Special Excise Duty - Annual Levy and Deemed Clearance - Finance Act, 1978, Section 37; Finance Act, 1988; Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 9A - The special excise duty is an annual levy that attaches to goods at the time of manufacture, but payment is deferred to the date of clearance; if goods manufactured during a levy period are not cleared by the last day of that levy, they are deemed to be cleared on that last day - In the instant case, goods manufactured prior to 28 February 1988 and cleared on or after 1 March 1988 were deemed to be cleared on 28 February 1988, on which date a notification under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules granted total exemption from special excise duty - Held that the appellants were not liable to pay special excise duty on such goods because the duty that operated subsequent to 1 March 1988 was a new levy under a different statute and distinct from the previous levy; Rule 9A did not operate in such circumstances (Paras 5-6).

B) Central Excise - Rate of Duty - Applicability of Rule 9A - Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 9A - Rule 9A provides that the rate of duty applicable to excisable goods is the rate in force on the date of actual removal from factory or warehouse - However, where goods are deemed to have been removed on the last day of a previous levy period, they are not treated as removed on the actual date of clearance under a subsequent levy - Held that Rule 9A could not be invoked to subject goods manufactured during an exempt period to a new levy introduced after that period; the new levy was distinct and Rule 9A had no application (Paras 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether goods manufactured prior to 28 February 1988 and cleared on or after 1 March 1988 were subject to special excise duty levied by Finance Act, 1988, given the total exemption notification in force on 28 February 1988

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed; judgment and order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal set aside insofar as it related to the two appellants; no order as to costs. The court held that the appellants were not liable to pay special excise duty on goods manufactured before 28 February 1988 and cleared after 1 March 1988 because such goods were deemed cleared on 28 February 1988 when they were exempt by notification, and the new levy under Finance Act, 1988 was distinct and Rule 9A did not apply.

Law Points

  • Special excise duty is an annual levy under Finance Acts
  • levy attaches to goods at manufacture
  • payment deferred to clearance
  • if goods manufactured during levy period not cleared by last day
  • deemed cleared on that last day
  • if exempt on that date
  • no duty payable
  • new levy under different Finance Act distinct
  • Rule 9A does not apply
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1997 LawText (SC) (01) 121

1997-01-27

S.P. Bharucha, Faizan Uddin

M/s Ponds India Ltd.

Collector of Central Excise, Madras

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against order of Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal relating to levy of special excise duty on goods manufactured before 28 February 1988 and cleared after 1 March 1988

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of Tribunal order and declaration that they were not liable to pay special excise duty on the said goods

Filing Reason

Revenue had levied special excise duty under Finance Act, 1988 on goods manufactured prior to 28 February 1988 but cleared on or after 1 March 1988, and Tribunal upheld the levy

Previous Decisions

Collectors (Appeals) had allowed assesses' appeals; Tribunal reversed those orders and held collection of special excise duty valid

Issues

Whether goods manufactured prior to 28 February 1988 and cleared on or after 1 March 1988 were subject to special excise duty levied by the Finance Act, 1988 Whether Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies to determine the rate of duty on actual date of removal for such goods What is the effect of the total exemption notification in force on 28 February 1988 on the deemed clearance date

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants contended that applying the principle of Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., goods manufactured before 28 February 1988 and cleared after 1 March 1988 were not liable to fresh special excise duty because on the last day of previous levy they were wholly exempt Revenue argued that Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules applied, and the rate of duty should be the rate in force on the date of actual removal, which was after 1 March 1988 when the new levy was in force

Ratio Decidendi

Special excise duty under the Finance Acts is an annual levy. The levy attaches to goods at the time of manufacture, but payment is deferred to the date of clearance, with the rate being that in force on the date of clearance. If goods manufactured during a levy period are not cleared by the last day of that levy, they must be deemed to have been cleared on that last day. Therefore, duty liability is determined as of that deemed clearance date. If on that date the goods are exempt from duty by notification, no duty is payable even if the actual clearance occurs later when a new levy is in force. The new levy under a different Finance Act is a distinct levy, and Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules does not apply to subject such goods to the new levy.

Judgment Excerpts

The levy attaches to the goods; the date of payment is deferred to the date of clearance, the rate being the rate which is effective on the date of clearance. Where goods have been manufactured while the levy of special excise duty is operative and have not been cleared until the last date of that levy, the goods must be deemed to have been removed on that last date. It is not possible to accept the Revenue’s contention that the said goods would be liable to bear special excise duty as levied after 1st March, 1988, for the reason that the special excise duty that operated subsequent to 1st March, 1988 was a new levy under a different statute and distinct from that which operated during the period 1st March, 1987 until 28th February, 1988. Rule 9A does not operate in such circumstances.

Procedural History

The Revenue appealed to the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal against orders of the Collectors (Appeals) which had allowed assesses' appeals. The Tribunal reversed those orders and held that collection of special excise duty on clearances on or after 1 March 1988 of goods manufactured prior to that date was valid. The assesses, including the appellants, appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance Act, 1978: Section 37
  • Finance Act, 1987: Not mentioned (levy provision similar to Section 37 of Finance Act, 1978)
  • Finance Act, 1988: Not mentioned (levy provision similar to Section 37 of Finance Act, 1978)
  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 2(d) (definition of excisable goods as quoted in Vazir Sultan)
  • Central Excise Rules, 1944: Rules 8, 9, 9A
  • General Clauses Act, 1897: Section 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court: Partition Suit Involving Properties Outside Jurisdiction Requires Clause XII Leave; Plaint Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for Partial Partition Bar | Renu Balwant Maru v. Bupendra Damjibhai Tank & Ors.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Scheduled Caste Lessee's Right to Regularization of Nazool Land in Punjab by Setting Aside Eviction Orders. Eviction of Lessee Who Reclaimed Waste Land and Remained in Possession After Lease Expiry Held Unjustified as Economic E...