Supreme Court Directs Final Decree Drafting and Extends Election Deadline in Church Property Dispute. The Court Modifies High Court Decree and Corrects Articles 71 and 46 of the 1934 Church Constitution, Emphasizing Membership Criteria for Parish Assembly.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court was seized of post-judgment matters arising from its earlier judgment delivered on January 20, 1995, in a dispute concerning the Malankara Church. The present order dated February 5, 1997, dealt with the final drafting of the decree in terms of the earlier judgment, correction of errors in the substituted Articles 71 and 46 of the 1934 Constitution, and extension of time for conducting elections. The Court had, by order dated March 25, 1996, requested the Registrar to prepare the decree after notice to both parties. The Registrar drafted a decree to which both parties filed objections. The matter was remitted for revision, and a revised draft decree again attracted objections from both sides. After hearing counsel for the parties, the Court gave specific directions for the preparation of the decree. It directed that the decree should first set out the ten clauses found in Para 142 of the judgment, then set out two specified portions from Para 141, followed by Para 150 dealing with the Kananaya church, and finally state that the decree passed by the High Court (the decree under appeal) would stand modified to that extent. In Part II of the order, the Court inserted a sentence in the order dated March 25, 1996, requiring that any person claiming to hold any office or post in the church must be bound by and swear allegiance to the 1934 Constitution. In Part III, the Court noticed an error in Articles 71 and 46 as drafted, where the word 'families' had been used instead of 'members of the Parish Assembly'. It directed substitution of 'member' or 'members' wherever 'family' or 'families' occurred, and clarified that 'members' referred to members as contemplated by clause (7) of the 1934 Constitution dealing with Parish church and Parish Assembly. The first proviso in Article 71 was deleted. In Part IV, the Court noted that due to the controversies, no elections had been held as directed. It had earlier directed elections within three months from March 25, 1996, on the basis of the amended Articles. The time for conducting elections of members of the Association and Diocesan Assemblies was extended up to and inclusive of April 30, 1997. The order was procedural and aimed at implementing the substantive judgment, correcting clerical errors, and enabling compliance with the election timeline. No substantive legal issue was decided afresh, and the Court's directions were binding on both parties to the dispute.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Decree Drafting - Supreme Court directions for preparation of decree - Church Constitution, 1934, Articles 71, 46, clause (7) - The Court directed the decree to set out the ten clauses in Para 142, specified portions of Para 141, Para 150, and modify the High Court decree accordingly. Both parties had filed objections to the draft decree, and the Court resolved the drafting by specifying exact portions to be included. Held that the decree shall be prepared in the manner indicated to give effect to the earlier judgment (Paras 142,141,150).

B) Church Constitution - Amendment of Articles - Correction of error substituting 'member/members' for 'family/families' - Church Constitution, 1934, Articles 71, 46, clause (7) - The Court observed that in Articles 71 and 46, as drafted, the word 'families' had been used instead of 'members of the Parish Assembly'. It directed substitution of 'member' or 'members' wherever 'family' or 'families' occurred, and clarified that 'members' referred to those contemplated in clause (7) of the 1934 Constitution. Held that the first proviso in Article 71 was deleted (Paras 142,141,150).

C) Election Law - Extension of Time - Election deadline extended to April 30, 1997 - Church Constitution, 1934, Articles 71, 46 - Both parties submitted that no elections could be held due to controversies, and the Court had earlier directed elections within three months from March 25, 1996. The Court extended the time for conducting elections of members of the Association and Diocesan Assemblies up to and inclusive of April 30, 1997. Held that the extension was necessary to enable compliance with the amended Articles (Paras 142,141,150).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Drafting of decree in accordance with judgment dated January 20, 1995; correction of errors in Articles 71 and 46 of the 1934 Constitution; extension of time for conducting elections

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Decree to be prepared by setting out ten clauses of Para 142, specified portions of Para 141, Para 150, and modifying the High Court decree; correction of Articles 71 and 46 by replacing 'family/families' with 'member/members'; deletion of first proviso in Article 71; election deadline extended to April 30, 1997

Law Points

  • Directions for drafting decree to reflect paragraphs of earlier judgment
  • correction of errors in Articles 71 and 46 by substituting 'member/members' for 'family/families'
  • deletion of first proviso in Article 71
  • extension of election deadline to April 30
  • 1997
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1997 LawText (SC) (02) 196

1997-02-05

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, Suhas C. Sen, S.B. Majmudar

C.S. Vaidyanathan, Harish N. Salve, F.S. Nariman, Raju Ramachandran, T.L.V. Iyer, P.K. Manohar, Roy Abraham, Ms. Baby Krishnan, E.M.S. Anam, Ms. Lily Thomas, Ms. K. V. Vijayakumar, P.J. Philips, K.V. Mohan, T.G. N. Nair, Ranjit Thomas, Sudarsh Menon, S. Balakrishnan

Most Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and Ors. Etc.

Moran Mar Marthoma Mathews & Anr. Etc.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Post-judgment order relating to drafting of decree and correction of errors in church constitution articles

Remedy Sought

Both parties sought resolution of objections to draft decree and directions on correction of Articles 71 and 46 and extension of election time

Filing Reason

Objections filed by both parties to the draft decree prepared by the Registrar pursuant to earlier orders

Previous Decisions

Supreme Court judgment dated January 20, 1995; order dated March 25, 1996 directing preparation of decree and substitution of Articles 71 and 46; Registrar prepared draft decree and revised draft decree with objections

Issues

Drafting of decree in terms of the judgment dated January 20, 1995 Correction of error in Articles 71 and 46 substituting 'member/members' for 'family/families' and deletion of first proviso in Article 71 Extension of time for conducting elections of members of Association and Diocesan Assemblies

Submissions/Arguments

Both parties filed objections to the draft decree Counsel for both parties submitted that no elections could be held so far due to controversies and sought extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court, to give effect to its judgment dated January 20, 1995, directed the preparation of decree in specific terms and corrected errors in Articles 71 and 46 of the Church Constitution by replacing 'family/families' with 'member/members' as contemplated in clause (7), and extended election deadline to allow compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

In the first instance, the decree shall set out the ten clauses found in Para 142 of the Judgment. Instead of mentioning 'members of the Parish Assembly', the word 'families' is used. We, therefore, direct that wherever the word 'family' or 'families' occur in the said two Articles, as drafted by us, they shall be substituted by the words 'member' or 'members', as the case may be. The time for conducting the said elections is extended upto and inclusive of April 30, 1997.

Procedural History

The main matter was decided by Supreme Court on January 20, 1995. On March 25, 1996, the Court directed preparation of decree and substitution of Articles 71 and 46. The Registrar prepared a draft decree, both parties filed objections, and the matter was remitted for revision. Revised draft again received objections. On February 5, 1997, the Court directed final decree terms, corrections, and extended election deadline.

Acts & Sections

  • Church Constitution, 1934: Articles 71, 46, clause (7)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Rejection of Plaint in Agricultural Land Rights Dispute — Trial Court's Order Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Upheld for Absence of Coparcenary or Khatedari Pleadi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Civil Dispute Nature. Allegations of Fabrication of Trust Documents Found to Be Civil in Nature, Not Attracting Criminal Offences Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC.