Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Regularization of Service Due to Co-terminus Nature of Posts. Regularization Not Permissible as Posts Created Under a Temporary Scheme Sponsored by Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the respondents, who were working as Binders, Machine Operators, and Class IV employees under a scheme sponsored by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. They sought regularization of their services, which led to the High Court of Madhya Pradesh allowing their petition. The appellant, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, challenged this order, arguing that the posts created under the scheme were co-terminus and could not be regularized. The Supreme Court noted that the posts were temporary and dependent on the continuation of the scheme, which could be abolished at any time. Therefore, the direction for regularization was deemed violative of the nature of the posts. The Court modified the High Court's order, allowing the respondents to be paid according to the scale of pay for the posts they were currently occupying, but not granting regularization. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Regularization of Service - Co-terminus Nature of Posts - Not applicable under the scheme sponsored by Indian Council of Agricultural Research - The High Court's order to regularize the services of the respondents was found to be violative of the nature of the posts, which are temporary and dependent on the scheme's continuation. The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order, directing that the respondents be paid according to the scale of pay for the posts they are currently occupying. Held that regularization is not permissible as the posts are not permanent (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are entitled to regularization of their services in light of the co-terminus nature of the posts created under the scheme.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order, directing that the respondents be paid according to the scale of pay for the posts they are currently occupying, but denied regularization of their services.

Law Points

  • Regularization of service
  • Co-terminus posts
  • Employment rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1997 LawText (SC) (04) 93

1997-04-07

K. Ramaswamy, D.P. Wadhwa

Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, M.P.

Bal Kishan Soni & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for regularization of service

Remedy Sought

Regularization of service by the respondents

Filing Reason

Respondents sought regularization under a scheme

Previous Decisions

High Court allowed the writ petition

Issues

Entitlement to regularization of service Nature of posts under the scheme

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that posts are co-terminus and cannot be regularized Respondents claimed entitlement to regularization based on their service

Ratio Decidendi

The posts created under the scheme were co-terminus and not permanent, thus regularization was not permissible.

Judgment Excerpts

The direction to regularise the services is violative of their right to posts. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from the order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh passed in Misc. Petition No. 2935 of 1986 on 9th February, 1995 and the order passed in Review petition (MCC No. 461 of 1995) dated 12th July, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit by Temple Trust Against Tenant's Son. Tenant's Son Cannot Claim Tenancy Rights After Father's Death Without Attornment or Consent of Landlord.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Criminal Complaint Alleging False Revenue Entry. Court upholds issuance of process against accused for offences under IPC sections 166, 192, 199, 466 r/w 109 based on prima fac...