Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Employment Termination Case Due to Lack of Hearing. Termination Declared Invalid as No Opportunity Was Provided to the Appellant Before the Decision, Violating Natural Justice Principles Under Section 35(3) of the Bihar University Act, 1976.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the termination of the appellant's services as a lecturer at Sido Kanhu University. The appellant, who had been appointed as a lecturer in 1986, challenged the termination of his services, which was based on the claim that his appointment was unlawful. The appellant argued that he had been working since 1978 and sought regularization of his services. The Vice Chancellor's decision to terminate his services was contested on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice principles. The court examined whether the appellant was given a fair opportunity to defend his position before the termination. It was found that the High Court had not adequately addressed the issue of the appellant's right to a hearing. The Supreme Court reiterated that any action taken against an employee must be fair and just, and that the absence of a hearing rendered the termination invalid. The court declared the termination invalid and ordered the university to pay the appellant's legal representatives the arrears of salary from the date of termination until his death. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside, with directions for payment of dues (Paras 1-40).

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Termination of Services - Requirement of Hearing - Bihar University Act, 1976, Section 35(3) - The court held that the termination of the appellant's services was invalid as he was not given an opportunity to be heard before the decision was made, violating the principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that an enquiry must precede termination if the appointment is claimed to be irregular (Paras 34-35).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the appellant's services was valid in the absence of an opportunity to be heard.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and declared the termination invalid. The court directed the university to pay the appellant's legal representatives the arrears of salary from the date of termination until his death.

Law Points

  • natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • public employment
  • termination of services
  • Bihar University Act
  • 1976
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1998 LawText (SC) (09) 37

1998-09-17

A.S. ANAND, S. RAJENDRA BABU

Sudhir Chandra, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey

BASUDEO TIWARY

SIDO KANHU UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of employment.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought regularization of his services and quashing of the termination order.

Filing Reason

The appellant's services were terminated without a hearing.

Previous Decisions

The High Court upheld the termination, which was contested in the Supreme Court.

Issues

Validity of termination without a hearing Jurisdiction of the Vice Chancellor in employment matters

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the termination was invalid due to lack of hearing and jurisdiction. The respondent contended that the appointment was irregular and did not require a hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the termination of services without providing an opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice, which are essential in public employment.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of the appellant by the respondent as per the notification referred to by us is invalid. In the absence of the same, whether such termination is valid.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition challenging the termination of his services, which was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court granted leave and heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Bihar University Act: Section 4(14), Section 35(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of the 2013 Act for Land Acquired Under National Highways Act. Court Holds That Additional Compensation at 12% Is Payable on Market Value Including Multiplication Factor, and Direc...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Charges Against Retired Bank Official in CBI Corruption Case — Prima Facie Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy and Abuse of Official Position. The Court held that the High Court erred in discharging the accused at the pre-charge ...