Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Gang Rape Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Credible Explanation — Allegations of Repeated Rape Over Seven Years Found Highly Improbable and an Abuse of Process of Law.

  • 313
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Haji Iqbal @ Bala, was the original accused No. 2 in FIR No. 195 of 2022 registered at Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, for offences under Sections 376-D (gang rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The FIR was lodged on 25.08.2022 by a woman (referred to as 'X') alleging that in 2011 she purchased a plot of land, which was forcibly occupied by Javed, Haji Iqbal, and Mahmud in 2012. She claimed that between November 2018 and subsequent dates, she was repeatedly raped by Javed, Alishan, Afjal, and their advocate Jishan on the pretext of vacating the land, and was threatened with death. The appellant filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15172 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking quashing of the FIR, which was dismissed on 17.10.2022. Aggrieved, the appellant approached the Supreme Court by way of special leave petition. The Supreme Court granted leave and considered the issue of whether the FIR should be quashed due to inordinate delay and lack of credible explanation. The Court noted that the alleged incidents of rape occurred between November 2018 and subsequent dates, but the FIR was lodged only in August 2022, nearly four years after the first alleged incident and 11 years after the land purchase. The Court found that the allegations of repeated rape over a period of seven years, without any complaint to the police or any other authority, were highly improbable and lacked credibility. The Court also observed that the FIR appeared to be motivated by a land dispute and was an abuse of the process of law. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inordinate Delay - FIR lodged after 11 years of alleged incident without credible explanation - Held that such delay, coupled with the nature of allegations (repeated rape over seven years) and the backdrop of a land dispute, makes the FIR an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing (Paras 1-10).

B) Indian Penal Code - Gang Rape - Section 376-D IPC - Delay in FIR - Allegations of repeated rape by multiple persons over a period of seven years - Held that the allegations are highly improbable and the delay in lodging the FIR, without any explanation for the gap, renders the prosecution unsustainable (Paras 3-10).

C) Indian Penal Code - Criminal Intimidation - Section 506 IPC - Delay in FIR - Allegations of threat to life - Held that the delay in reporting the threat, along with the overall delay, makes the FIR liable to be quashed (Paras 3-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in refusing to quash the FIR under Section 482 CrPC when the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of about 11 years without any satisfactory explanation, and the allegations appeared to be motivated by a land dispute.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the High Court dated 17.10.2022, and quashed the FIR No. 195 of 2022 registered with Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Inordinate delay in lodging FIR
  • lack of credible explanation for delay
  • abuse of process of law
  • quashing of FIR under inherent powers
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 376-D IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 INSC 686

Criminal Appeal No. 2343 of 2023 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 2988 of 2023)

2023-08-25

J.B. Pardiwala

2023 INSC 686

Haji Iqbal @ Bala

State of U.P. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against the order of the High Court refusing to quash an FIR for offences under Sections 376-D and 506 IPC.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (accused No. 2) sought quashing of FIR No. 195 of 2022 and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of about 11 years without any satisfactory explanation, and the allegations were motivated by a land dispute, making the FIR an abuse of process of law.

Previous Decisions

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15172 of 2022 filed by the appellant, declining to quash the FIR.

Issues

Whether the FIR lodged after an inordinate delay of about 11 years, without any credible explanation, should be quashed as an abuse of process of law. Whether the allegations of repeated rape over a period of seven years, in the backdrop of a land dispute, are credible and warrant continuation of prosecution.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate delay of about 11 years from the alleged land dispute and about 4 years from the first alleged rape, without any satisfactory explanation, and the allegations were highly improbable and motivated by a land dispute. The respondent (State) argued that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence and the delay was not fatal, and the High Court rightly refused to quash the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi

An FIR lodged after an inordinate delay without any credible explanation, especially when the allegations are highly improbable and appear to be motivated by a civil dispute, amounts to an abuse of the process of law and warrants quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. This appeal is at the instance of the original accused No. 2 in the First Information Report (FIR) No. 195 of 2022 dated 25.08.2022 registered with the Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, State of U.P. for the offences punishable under Sections 376-D and 506 resply of the Indian Penal Code...

Procedural History

FIR No. 195 of 2022 was registered on 25.08.2022 at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur, U.P. for offences under Sections 376-D and 506 IPC. The appellant filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15172 of 2022 before the High Court of Allahabad seeking quashing of the FIR, which was dismissed on 17.10.2022. The appellant then filed S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 2988 of 2023 before the Supreme Court, which was converted into Criminal Appeal No. 2343 of 2023 and allowed on 25.08.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376-D, 506
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Gang Rape Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Credible Explanation — Allegations of Repeated Rape Over Seven Years Found Highly Improbable and an Abuse of Process of Law.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Degree Holders Entitled to Promotion Quota Based on Qualification at Time of Appointment. The court held that Junior Engineers who possessed an Engineering Degree at the time of appointment...