Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Calibration of Storage Vats for Liquor Manufacturing. The court upheld the applicability of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 to storage vats used by liquor manufacturers for excise duty assessment.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between a liquor manufacturing company and the Controller of Weights and Measures regarding the applicability of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 to storage vats used for liquor. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture and sale of liquor under the U.P. Excise Act, received notices from the Inspector of Weights and Measures to verify and calibrate their storage vats. The appellants contested the notices, arguing that the Act did not apply to their operations as the storage of liquor did not constitute a transaction in trade or commerce. The High Court dismissed their petitions, affirming that the Act's provisions were applicable to liquor manufacturers. The appellants appealed to the Supreme Court, which examined the definition of 'use in transaction for trade or commerce' under Section 2(jj) of the Act. The court noted that while storage alone might not constitute a transaction, the storage of liquor was intrinsically linked to the assessment of excise duty, thus falling under the Act's purview. The court upheld the High Court's ruling, stating that the storage vats were indeed subject to calibration as they were necessary for determining the volume of liquor for excise duty assessment. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, confirming the applicability of the Act to the storage vats used by the appellants for liquor manufacturing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Applicability of Weights and Measures Act - Storage Vats for Liquor - Provisions of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 apply to storage vats used for liquor - The court held that storage vats are covered under the Act as they are essential for determining excise duty based on volume, thus requiring calibration. (Paras 379-381)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 apply to the storage vats used by liquor manufacturers.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the storage vats used by the appellants for liquor manufacturing are covered under the provisions of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 and require calibration.

Law Points

  • Applicability of U.P. Weights and Measures Act
  • Definition of 'use in transaction for trade or commerce'
  • Calibration of storage vats
  • Excise duty assessment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1989 LawText (SC) (01) 44

Civil Appeal No. 506 of 1989

1989-01-31

K.N. Singh, Kuldip Singh

1989 AIR 959, 1989 SCR (1) 375, 1989 SCC (2) 405

Dr. L.M. Singhvi, R.B. Mehrotra, Anil Dev Singh, Mrs. S. Dikshit

Mohan Meakins Breweries Ltd.

Controller of Weights and Measures, U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the applicability of the U.P. Weights and Measures Act to liquor storage vats.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to quash the notices for calibration of storage vats.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the petitions, affirming the applicability of the Act to liquor manufacturers.

Issues

Applicability of the U.P. Weights and Measures Act to liquor storage vats Requirement for calibration of storage vats under the Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that storage of liquor does not constitute a transaction in trade or commerce. The respondents contended that the storage vats are essential for determining excise duty.

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'use in transaction for trade or commerce' under Section 2(jj) of the U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959 extends to storage vats as they are necessary for determining excise duty based on volume.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants were engaged in manufacture and sale of liquor, under licence granted to them under the U.P. Excise Act. The provisions of the Act were made applicable to an undertaking engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcohol with effect from October 1, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1959: Section 2(jj), Section 7, Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Assessee in Sales Tax Declared Goods Dispute. Cycle Rims Qualify as Declared Goods Under Section 14(iv)(xiv) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Cannot Be Taxed Beyond 4% Under Section 15.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Reviews Rejection of Plaint in Contract Recovery Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Scope of Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Limitation Issues Considered in Appeal Against Commercial Court Decree.