Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Abated Due to Appellant's Death in Defamation Case — Right to Sue for Defamation Does Not Survive Death. Citing Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, the court held that the right to sue for defamation does not survive the death of the appellant, leading to the automatic abatement of the appeal.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a defamation suit filed by the appellant against the respondent, claiming damages. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the district court allowed the appeal and awarded damages. The respondent's second appeal to the High Court resulted in a reversal of the district court's decree, leading to the appellant's appeal to the Supreme Court. During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant died, leaving behind two grandsons and two granddaughters. They filed applications to substitute themselves as legal representatives and to condone the delay in filing these applications. The Supreme Court examined whether the appeal abated due to the appellant's death. It analyzed the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Indian Succession Act, concluding that the right to sue for defamation does not survive the death of the appellant. The court reasoned that since the appellant was seeking to enforce a right that did not survive his death, the appeal abated automatically, and the legal representatives had no right to continue the appeal. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and the applications filed by the legal representatives as not maintainable, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Abatement of Appeal - Right to Sue - Right to sue for defamation does not survive the death of the appellant - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXII, Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The court held that since the right to sue for defamation does not survive the death of the appellant, the appeal abated automatically upon his death, and his legal representatives could not be substituted in his place (Paras 810-811).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the right to sue for defamation survives the death of the appellant in an appeal arising from a defamation case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as having abated due to the appellant's death, ruling that the right to sue for defamation does not survive death, thus the legal representatives could not be substituted.

Law Points

  • Abatement of appeal
  • right to sue
  • defamation
  • legal representatives
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • Indian Succession Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1985 LawText (SC) (11) 1

Civil Appeal No. 91 of 1972

1985-11-29

Madon, D.P., Oza, G.L.

1986 AIR 411, 1985 SCR Supl. (3) 805, 1986 SCC (1) 118, 1985 SCALE (2) 1098

A.S. Nambiar, T.T. Kunhitkanan

Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan

Thekittil Gopalankutty Nair

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Defamation suit leading to appeal

Remedy Sought

Substitution of legal representatives and continuation of appeal

Filing Reason

Appellant's death during appeal

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed suit, district court awarded damages, high court reversed the decree

Issues

Does the right to sue for defamation survive the death of the appellant? What is the effect of the appellant's death on the pending appeal?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's legal representatives argued for substitution and continuation of the appeal. The respondent contended that the appeal abated due to the appellant's death.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to sue for defamation does not survive the death of the appellant, leading to automatic abatement of the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

the right to sue for defamation does not survive his death the appeal abated automatically on his death

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit for defamation, which was dismissed. The district court allowed the appeal, but the high court reversed this decision. The appellant died during the pendency of the Supreme Court appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXII
  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 306
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Exemption Notification Interpretation Clarified. The court found that the exclusion in the notification specifically pertains to styrene butadiene rubber and oil extended styrene butad...