4472

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Promotion Claims - Inordinate delay in claiming promotion invalidates relief - Article 32 of the Constitution - The petitioner’s claim for promotion was dismissed due to an eleven-year delay without valid explanation, despite successive representations. Held that such delay justified refusal of relief (Paras 509F).

B) Administrative Law - Premature Retirement - Applicability of Retirement Rules to Judicial Officers - Punjab Civil Service (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975 - The court held that the rules apply to judicial officers and were finalized after consultation with the High Court, complying with Article 234 of the Constitution (Paras 510E).

C) Administrative Law - Public Interest - Definition of public interest in context of premature retirement - The expression

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner was entitled to promotion and whether the premature retirement was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Promotion claims
  • Premature retirement
  • Public interest
  • Judicial service
  • Article 32
  • Article 311
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1980 LawText (SC) (08) 5

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by YES Bank in Shareholder Dispute Over Board Control and Share Transfer. Court upholds interim order restraining transfer of shares and appointment of directors pending final disposal of suit.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notice for Stamp Duty on Mortgage Deed Executed by Cooperative Society Under Government Remission Order. Government Order for Remission of Stamp Duty Dated 19.3.1990 Held Binding on Authorities Despite Subsequent Au...