Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Drugs Price Control Case — Clarifies Definition of Formulation. The court held that allegations, if proved, would amount to a contravention punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a prosecution against a firm and its managing partner and pharmacist for charging excess prices for medicines in violation of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979. The trial court convicted the respondents, imposing fines and imprisonment. However, the Kerala High Court acquitted them, ruling that the medicines in question were not 'formulations' as defined in the Order. The Supreme Court examined the definitions of 'bulk drug' and 'formulation' under the Order, concluding that the High Court had misconstrued these definitions. The court clarified that a 'bulk drug' can be used as an ingredient in a formulation and that the provisions of the Order apply to all formulations, including those not specified in the Third Schedule. Despite this, the Supreme Court did not restore the trial court's conviction, considering the peculiar facts of the case and the time elapsed since the alleged offence. The court emphasized the importance of correct interpretation of the Order for future guidance, ultimately rejecting the High Court's construction but not interfering with the acquittal of the respondents.

Headnote

A) Drugs Law - Definition of Formulation - Interpretation of 'formulation' under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 - The definition of 'formulation' is broad and includes even one bulk drug treated as a medicine. The court held that the High Court misconstrued the provisions of the Order, and allegations, if proved, would amount to contravention punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. (Paras 69-72)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court correctly construed the provisions of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 regarding the definitions of 'bulk drug' and 'formulation'.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, clarifying the definitions under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979, but did not restore the conviction of the respondents.

Law Points

  • Drugs (Price Control) Order
  • 1979
  • Essential Commodities Act
  • 1955
  • definition of bulk drug
  • definition of formulation
  • contravention of price control provisions
  • maintainability of prosecution
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (01) 14

Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 1991

1991-01-15

Verma, Jagdish Saran, Ray, B.C.

1991 SCR (1) 65, 1991 SCC (2) 203, JT 1991 (1) 123, 1991 SCALE (1) 35

P.S. Poti, T.T. Kunhikannan, T.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, N. Sudhakaran

Balakrishna Pillai, Chief Inspector of Drugs Intelligence

Matha Mediclas and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal prosecution for violation of price control regulations.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the acquittal of the respondents.

Filing Reason

Prosecution initiated for charging excess prices for medicines.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the respondents, which was overturned by the High Court.

Issues

Correctness of High Court's construction of the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 Definition and applicability of 'formulation' and 'bulk drug'

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the High Court misinterpreted the provisions of the Order. Respondents contended that the definitions excluded their products from being classified as formulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that the definitions of 'bulk drug' and 'formulation' under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 are broad and that contraventions of price control provisions are punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

Judgment Excerpts

A bulk drug is one which may be capable of use by itself or as an ingredient in any formulation. The definition of 'formulation' is very wide and includes even one bulk drug where that one bulk drug by itself is treated as a medicine. The High Court misconstrued the provisions of the Drugs (Price Control) Order 1979.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the respondents, which was appealed to the High Court, resulting in their acquittal. The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal against the acquittal.

Acts & Sections

  • Essential Commodities Act, 1955: Section 3, Section 7
  • Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979: Paragraphs 2, 18, 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Probationary Police Sub-Inspectors Challenging Termination. Termination simpliciter of probationers for unsatisfactory performance without stigma does not require inquiry or hearing.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in POCSO Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Credibility Issues. The prosecution failed to establish the identity of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and significant delays in reporting the inci...