Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Sexual Assault Case — High Court's Acquittal Overturned. The court found that the testimony of the prosecutrix, corroborated by medical evidence, was sufficient to establish the offence of rape.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against the High Court's judgment that acquitted the accused, Ravi @ Nehru, who had been convicted for rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The incident occurred on 23.10.1989, when the five-year-old victim, PW-2, was allegedly assaulted by the accused. The victim reported the incident to her mother, PW-1, who took her to the hospital for examination. Medical examinations revealed that the victim's hymen was ruptured, although there were no external injuries. The Trial Court convicted the accused based on the evidence of the victim and other witnesses. However, the High Court disbelieved the victim's testimony, citing lack of corroboration from medical evidence. The Supreme Court found the High Court's reasoning flawed, emphasizing that the testimony of the prosecutrix alone could suffice for conviction, and that the absence of corroborative evidence did not negate the occurrence of rape. The Court restored the Trial Court's conviction, stating that the High Court had committed a grave miscarriage of justice. The accused was ordered to be taken back into custody to serve the remaining sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape - Definition and Evidence - Conviction can be based on the testimony of the prosecutrix alone - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376 - The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix, corroborated by medical evidence, was sufficient to establish the offence of rape, and the High Court's acquittal was perverse and inconsistent with the evidence on record. (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in acquitting the accused despite the evidence presented by the prosecution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, restored the conviction of the accused under Section 376 IPC, and ordered him to be taken back into custody to serve the remaining part of his sentence.

Law Points

  • Rape
  • Conviction based on testimony of prosecutrix
  • Medical evidence in sexual assault cases
  • Corroboration not mandatory
  • Legal definition of rape
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (SC) (07) 34

Appeal (crl.) 582 of 2000

2006-07-04

H.K. Sema, A.K. Mathur

State of Tamil Nadu

Ravi @ Nehru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal in a rape case

Remedy Sought

Restoration of conviction of the accused

Filing Reason

High Court's acquittal of the accused

Previous Decisions

Trial Court convicted the accused, High Court acquitted him

Issues

Whether the High Court erred in acquitting the accused despite the evidence presented by the prosecution. Whether the testimony of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient for conviction in a rape case.

Submissions/Arguments

The prosecution argued that the evidence of the victim and medical reports established the case of rape. The defense contended that the lack of corroborative medical evidence warranted acquittal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix, even without corroboration, can be sufficient for conviction in rape cases, and the High Court's acquittal was inconsistent with the evidence on record.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court unfortunately disbelieves the creditworthy testimony of this witness as artificial and unnatural. It is well-established principle that when a fully developed man has committed sexual assault with a minor girl aged about 4 or 5 years there is likelihood of an injury being caused on the penis.

Procedural History

The Trial Court convicted the accused for rape and sentenced him to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. The accused appealed to the High Court, which acquitted him. The State of Tamil Nadu then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Suit for Injunction Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Not Party to Proceedings. Award Set Aside as Petitioner's Rights Affected Without Hearing Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Domestic Violence Case — Jurisdiction Affirmed for Continuing Offence.