Supreme Court Allows Bank to File Special Appeal Against Promotion Order — Preliminary Objection Sustained. Court found merit in the objection that the Bank should have filed a special appeal before the High Court instead of a special leave petition.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by Farrukhabad Gramin Bank against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which directed the Bank to promote Ashok Saxena and others to the post of Field Supervisor. The High Court's order was issued on 19.12.2002, following a writ petition filed by the respondents. The Bank challenged this order by filing a special leave petition in the Supreme Court. During the hearing, the respondents raised a preliminary objection regarding the appropriateness of the Bank's direct approach to the Supreme Court instead of filing a special appeal before the High Court's Division Bench. The Supreme Court found merit in this objection and permitted the Bank to file a special appeal. The Court also directed that the time taken in the current proceedings would be excluded when considering the timeline for the appeal. Additionally, the Supreme Court addressed another appeal concerning a subsequent order from the High Court dated 24.11.2005, which had become infructuous due to the remittal order. The Court requested the Division Bench to dispose of the special appeal on merits expeditiously, while staying contempt proceedings until the appeal's resolution. The appeals were disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Special Leave Petition - Direct Filing - Court held that the Bank should have preferred a special appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court instead of filing a special leave petition directly in the Supreme Court. The preliminary objection raised by the respondents was found to have merit, leading to the direction for the Bank to approach the Division Bench for a special appeal against the order dated 19.12.2002 (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Bank could directly file a special leave petition instead of a special appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court permitted the Bank to file a special appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court against the order dated 19.12.2002, and directed that the time taken in the current proceedings be excluded. The Court also stayed contempt proceedings until the appeal's resolution and requested the Division Bench to dispose of the appeal within three months.

Law Points

  • Special Leave Petition
  • Writ Petition
  • Promotion
  • Division Bench
  • Interim Order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (SC) (08) 95

Appeal (civil) 3640 of 2006

2006-08-24

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, Tarun Chatterjee

Mahendra Anand

Farrukhabad Gramin Bank

Ashok Saxena & ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against a promotion order issued by the High Court.

Remedy Sought

The Bank sought to challenge the promotion order by filing a special leave petition.

Filing Reason

The Bank was aggrieved by the High Court's order directing the promotion of the writ petitioners.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had previously ordered the Bank to promote the writ petitioners on 19.12.2002.

Issues

Whether the Bank could directly file a special leave petition instead of a special appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court.

Submissions/Arguments

The Bank argued that it was entitled to file a special leave petition directly in the Supreme Court. The respondents contended that the proper course was to file a special appeal before the Division Bench.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of following proper procedural channels, allowing the Bank to appeal to the Division Bench instead of directly approaching the Supreme Court.

Judgment Excerpts

The Bank was also directed to promote the writ petitioners on the post of Field Supervisor within two weeks of the receipt of the certified copy of the order. We, therefore, permit the appellant-Bank to approach the Division Bench of the High Court and prefer a special appeal.

Procedural History

The Bank filed a special leave petition against the High Court's order dated 19.12.2002. The Supreme Court heard the matter and addressed a preliminary objection raised by the respondents regarding the appropriateness of the filing.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Waqf Property Lease Dispute. Civil Court Not Barred from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Lease Subsistence as Dispute Does Not Fall Under Waqf Tribunal's Exclusive Jurisd...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Framed Without Compliance with Section 239 Cr.P.C. — Magistrate Failed to Hear Accused or Examine Police Report Before Framing Charge Under Sections 354 and 506 IPC. The Court held that the mandatory procedure under...