Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition for Appeal — No Grounds Established for Entertaining Petition. Fresh Trial Ordered in Light of Prior Judgment Directing Re-examination of the Suit.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a special leave petition filed by Ramchandra against Rajendra Shrikrishna Deshmukh and others. The Supreme Court, presided over by Justices S.B. Sinha and P.K. Balasubramanyan, considered the petition on 2007-07-09. The court determined that there was no reason to entertain the special leave petition, particularly in light of a judgment rendered on the same day in a related civil appeal. The court indicated that the suit would be tried and disposed of afresh according to the directions provided in that earlier judgment. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without further proceedings.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Special Leave Petition - Dismissal of Petition - Special Leave Petition (Civil) 5753 of 2006 - The court found no reason to entertain the petition for special leave to appeal, referencing a prior judgment that directed a fresh trial of the suit. The petition was dismissed in light of the directions contained in the earlier judgment (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to entertain the special leave petition for appeal

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, finding no reason to entertain it, and directed that the suit be tried afresh in accordance with the earlier judgment.

Law Points

  • Special Leave Petition
  • Civil Appeal
  • Fresh Trial
  • Directions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (10) 29

Special Leave Petition (civil) 5753 of 2006

2007-07-09

P.K. Balasubramanyan, S.B. Sinha

Ramchandra

Rajendra Shrikrishna Deshmukh & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Special leave petition for appeal

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to appeal against a prior decision

Previous Decisions

Related civil appeal judgment rendered on the same day

Issues

Whether to entertain the special leave petition for appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for the appeal Court referenced prior judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the special leave petition was not to be entertained as the suit would be retried based on prior directions.

Judgment Excerpts

We see no reason to entertain this petition for special leave to appeal The petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The special leave petition was filed and subsequently dismissed by the Supreme Court.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Acquisition Compensation Award. Market Value Determined by Ready Reckoner Rates Upheld for Recreational Ground Reservation.