Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Criminal Procedure Case for Document Production. Court permitted the appellant to summon a document necessary for the trial, with directions for expeditious conclusion of the trial.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by Laxman Prasad Yadav against the State of Bihar. The appellant sought permission to summon a document dated 20th March, 2004 from the Command Hospital, Western Command, Chandimandir, which was deemed necessary for the trial. The Supreme Court, after hearing the arguments from both sides, allowed the appeal to the extent of permitting the summoning of the document. The court directed that the appellant must deposit the requisite costs for summoning the witnesses before the Trial Court within two weeks. Furthermore, the Trial Court was instructed to ensure that the trial is concluded as expeditiously as possible. The appeal was allowed subject to these conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Document Production - Summoning of Document - Not applicable - The court permitted the appellant to call for a document dated 20th March, 2004 from the Command Hospital, Western Command, Chandimandir, with the condition that requisite costs for summoning witnesses shall be deposited before the Trial Court. The Trial Court was directed to ensure that the trial is concluded expeditiously (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant could summon a document from the Command Hospital for the trial.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to the extent of permitting the appellant to summon the document from the Command Hospital, with conditions for cost deposit and expeditious trial.

Law Points

  • Document production
  • trial expeditiousness
  • appeal allowance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (01) 432

Appeal (crl.) 123 of 2008

2008-01-18

S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Gopal Singh

Laxman Prasad Yadav @ Laxman Yadav @ Lakshman Yadav

State of Bihar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal regarding document summoning

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought permission to summon a document

Filing Reason

To aid in the trial process

Issues

Summoning of document for trial Expeditious trial process

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for document necessity State counsel responded to the request

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of allowing necessary documents for a fair trial and the need for expeditious proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant may be permitted to call for the document dated 20th March, 2004 from the Command Hospital, Western Command, Chandimandir. The Trial Court shall see to it that the trial is concluded as expeditiously as possible.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from SLP(Crl.) No. 12/2008.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case. Appeal Raises Questions on Identification of Accused and Seizure of Cash Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Arms Act, 1959.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Act Coverage Dispute — Head Office Not Covered Under ESI Act, Branch Employees Cannot Be Clubbed. Clubbing of employees of branches not covered under ESI Act with head office employees for determining coverage...