Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Pre-Deposit in Central Excise Case — Restoration of Appeal Conditional on Payment. The court permitted the appellant to deposit the remaining pre-deposit amount to restore the appeal before CESTAT, setting aside previous orders of the High Court and CESTAT.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved M/s. Rattan Steel Works challenging the imposition of a duty and penalty by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai. Following a show cause notice dated 11th August 1998, the Commissioner imposed a duty of Rs.23,51,646/- and penalties on the appellant and its proprietor. The appellant appealed to the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), which required a pre-deposit of Rs.10,00,000/- for the appeal to be heard. The appellant only deposited Rs.1,00,000/- and the CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-compliance. The appellant's subsequent writ petition was dismissed by a Single Judge of the High Court, although a period was granted to deposit the remaining amount. The Division Bench of the High Court also dismissed the appeal but allowed a further two weeks for the deposit. The appellant then approached the Supreme Court seeking permission to deposit the remaining amount to restore the appeal. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal, setting aside the orders of the High Court and CESTAT, and allowed the appellant to deposit the remaining Rs.9,00,000/- within three weeks to restore the appeal. The court clarified that failure to deposit would result in the dismissal of the appeal.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Pre-deposit Requirement - Restoration of Appeal - Central Excise Act, 1944, Section Not mentioned - The court allowed the appellant to deposit the remaining pre-deposit amount within a specified time to restore the appeal before CESTAT, setting aside previous orders of the High Court and CESTAT. Held that failure to deposit would result in dismissal of the appeal (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be allowed to deposit the remaining amount of pre-deposit to restore the appeal before CESTAT.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the High Court and CESTAT, and directed that if the remaining amount of Rs.9,00,000/- is deposited within three weeks, the appeal before CESTAT shall be restored and disposed of on merits. If the amount is not deposited, the dismissal order of CESTAT shall remain in force.

Law Points

  • Central Excise
  • Pre-deposit
  • Appeal
  • Restoration of Appeal
  • Jurisdiction of CESTAT
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (02) 437

Civil Appeal No. 426 of 2003

2008-02-01

ASHOK BHAN, DALVEER BHANDARI

M/s. Rattan Steel Works

Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the imposition of duty and penalties by the Commissioner of Central Excise.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of appeal before CESTAT by permitting deposit of remaining pre-deposit amount.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance with pre-deposit order leading to dismissal of appeal.

Previous Decisions

Dismissal of writ petition and appeal by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the appellant should be allowed to deposit the remaining amount of pre-deposit to restore the appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel submitted that the remaining amount would be deposited within three weeks.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of allowing the appellant to comply with the pre-deposit requirement to ensure the right to appeal is preserved.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant deposited only a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- the appeal before the CESTAT shall stand restored and disposed of on merits.

Procedural History

The Commissioner imposed duty and penalties, CESTAT required pre-deposit, appeal dismissed for non-compliance, writ petition dismissed by High Court, appeal dismissed by Division Bench, Supreme Court appeal filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Purchasers in Property Dispute — No Allegations of Cheating Made Against Appellants in FIR. The court held that where the FIR contains no allegations against the purchasers and a civil suit is pend...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Five Accused in Murder Case Under Sections 302, 148, and 149 IPC. Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Including Independent Medical Professional Sustained Conviction Despite Unexplained Delay in Police Examination of Wit...