Supreme Court Grants Conditional Interim Relief to Fishermen in Purse Seine Fishing Ban Dispute. Court allowed fishing beyond territorial waters subject to registration and tracking conditions, balancing jurisdictional claims under Entry 57 List I with ecological concerns pending final decision.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court considered a Special Leave Petition and three Writ Petitions concerning restrictions on Purse Seine Fishing imposed by the Tamil Nadu government. The Fisheries Department of Tamil Nadu had banned Purse Seine Fishing within territorial waters (12 nautical miles) through an order dated March 25, 2000, which was upheld by the Madras High Court on February 5, 2019. Subsequently, another writ petition was dismissed by the High Court on April 20, 2021, leading to the present appeals. The petitioners sought interim relief to fish beyond Tamil Nadu's territorial waters, arguing that the State lacked jurisdiction beyond 12 nautical miles as fishing beyond territorial waters fell under Union jurisdiction per Entry 57 of List I of the Seventh Schedule. They contended that the Union of India had not imposed any restrictions on Purse Seine Fishing. The State of Tamil Nadu opposed the relief, asserting that Purse Seine Fishing was ecologically harmful, non-selective, and advantaged affluent fishermen over traditional ones, and that monitoring beyond territorial waters was difficult. The Court noted that the ban's justification was pending final consideration, with no interim order previously granted. It observed that other coastal states had varying stances, and the Union of India indicated no restrictions beyond territorial waters. The Court, aiming to balance interests, granted a restricted interim order allowing Purse Seine Fishing beyond territorial waters within the Exclusive Economic Zone, subject to conditions including vessel registration, use of Vessel Tracking Systems, limited operating days, and designated landing centers. The Court referenced but kept open two prior decisions cited by the State, pending further inputs from a Central Government committee. The matter was listed for further proceedings.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Legislative Competence - Entry 57 List I Seventh Schedule - Union jurisdiction over fishing beyond territorial waters - Petitioners argued State of Tamil Nadu lacked jurisdiction to restrict fishing beyond 12 nautical miles as per Entry 57 of List I - Court noted Union of India had placed no restrictions on Purse Seine Fishing beyond territorial waters - Held that interim permission could be granted for fishing beyond territorial waters within Exclusive Economic Zone subject to conditions (Paras 8-9, 11, 13).

B) Environmental Law - Fishing Regulations - Purse Seine Fishing ban - Ecological impact and traditional fishing rights - State of Tamil Nadu opposed interim relief citing Purse Seine Fishing as harmful to marine life, non-selective, and benefiting affluent fishermen over traditional ones - Court acknowledged ecological concerns and conflict of economic interests but granted conditional interim relief to balance interests pending final decision (Paras 10, 13).

C) Procedural Law - Interim Relief - Conditions for fishing operations - Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972 registration and vessel tracking - Court granted restricted interim order allowing Purse Seine Fishing beyond territorial waters with ten specific conditions including vessel registration under Section 11 of Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972, Vessel Tracking System, limited operating days, and designated landing centers - Held that interests of all parties needed protection through conditional interim relief (Paras 13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners should be granted interim relief to fish using Purse Seine Fishing nets beyond the territorial waters of Tamil Nadu, pending final determination of the legality of the State's ban.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Court granted restricted interim order allowing Purse Seine Fishing beyond territorial waters within Exclusive Economic Zone subject to ten conditions including vessel registration, Vessel Tracking System, limited operating days, and designated landing centers

Law Points

  • Interim relief
  • jurisdiction of State vs Union over fishing
  • constitutional interpretation of legislative entries
  • balancing of economic interests and ecological concerns
  • conditions for fishing operations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (1) 79

S.L.P.(c) No.8442/2021, Writ Petition No. 1039 of 2022

2023-01-24

[A.S. BOPANNA J. , SUDHANSHU DHULIA J.] 

Shri Mukul Rohatgi, Shri Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Shri Sirajudeen, Shri K. M. Nataraj

FISHERMAN CARE, REGISTERED ASSOCIATION

THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRYING AND FISHERIES REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & ORS.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Special Leave Petition and Writ Petitions challenging ban on Purse Seine Fishing

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek interim relief to fish beyond territorial waters using Purse Seine Fishing nets

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by restrictions imposed by Tamil Nadu Government on Purse Seine Fishing

Previous Decisions

Madras High Court dismissed challenges to ban on February 5, 2019 and April 20, 2021

Issues

Whether interim relief should be granted for Purse Seine Fishing beyond territorial waters pending final decision on ban

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argue State lacks jurisdiction beyond territorial waters per Entry 57 List I State opposes relief citing ecological harm and advantage to affluent fishermen

Ratio Decidendi

Interim relief can be granted to balance interests when Union has not restricted fishing beyond territorial waters, subject to conditions to address ecological and monitoring concerns pending final determination

Judgment Excerpts

“We have before this Court a Special Leave Petition, and three Writ Petitions, where the common issue is the use of a fishing method called Purse Seine Fishing.” “After hearing both the sides at some length, we are of a prima facie opinion, that interest of all parties need to be protected.”

Procedural History

Tamil Nadu banned Purse Seine Fishing in 2000; Madras High Court upheld ban in 2019 and dismissed further petition in 2021; Petitioners filed Special Leave Petition and Writ Petitions before Supreme Court seeking interim relief

Acts & Sections

  • Marine Products Export Development Authority Act, 1972: Section 11
  • Tamil Nadu Marine Fishing Regulation Rules, 2020: Rule 17(7)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Conditional Interim Relief to Fishermen in Purse Seine Fishing Ban Dispute. Court allowed fishing beyond territorial waters subject to registration and tracking conditions, balancing jurisdictional claims under Entry 57 List I wi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Over Defence Representative Eligibility. The Court held that service regulations and handbook provisions restricting defence representatives to serving employees must be upheld, and permi...