Supreme Court Modifies Receiver Appointment in Civil Appeal — Adjusts due to Age of Original Appointee. The court found that the original appointee was unable to fulfill her duties due to her advanced age, necessitating a change in the Receiver.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal concerning the appointment of a Receiver in a civil matter. The petitioner, Chhagan Lal (deceased) by legal representatives, sought modification of an earlier order appointing Smt. Gulab Bai as Receiver. The Supreme Court had previously ordered that Smt. Gulab Bai, the widow of the respondent Kamal Chand (deceased), be appointed as Receiver to ensure compliance with the court's order regarding possession of the suit property. However, it was brought to the court's attention that Smt. Gulab Bai, being approximately 80 years old, was not in a position to undertake the responsibilities associated with the role of Receiver. In light of this information, the court decided to appoint Shri Rishi Gupta, an Advocate representing the respondent, as the new Receiver. Additionally, the court extended the time for restoring possession of the suit property by another four weeks. The modification was made to ensure that the duties of the Receiver could be effectively carried out, reflecting the court's concern for the practicalities of the situation. The order dated 26th February 2008 was thus modified accordingly.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Modification of Receiver Appointment - Change of Receiver due to incapacity - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court modified the appointment of the Receiver as the original appointee was unable to perform her duties due to age. The court appointed a new Receiver and extended the time for compliance with the order (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to modify the appointment of the Receiver due to the original appointee's inability to perform duties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the previous order by appointing Shri Rishi Gupta as the new Receiver and extended the time for restoring possession of the suit property by four weeks.

Law Points

  • Modification of orders
  • Appointment of Receiver
  • Compliance with court orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (03) 147

Appeal (civil) 1638 of 2008

2008-03-13

Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Chhagan Lal (D) by LRs. & Ors.

Kamal Chand (D) by LRs. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding the appointment of a Receiver.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the appointment of the Receiver.

Filing Reason

Inability of the original appointee to perform her duties.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 26th February 2008 appointed Smt. Gulab Bai as Receiver.

Issues

Modification of Receiver appointment Capacity of appointee to perform duties

Submissions/Arguments

The original appointee is unable to perform due to age. A new Receiver should be appointed to ensure compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for practical compliance with its orders, allowing for modifications when the appointed individual is unable to fulfill their responsibilities.

Judgment Excerpts

In that view of the matter, in place of Smt. Gulab Bai, we appoint Shri Rishi Gupta, an Advocate of the respondent, as Receiver to comply with the order of this Court. Time to restore the possession of the suit property is also extended by another four weeks from this date.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed, and an order was made on 26th February 2008 appointing Smt. Gulab Bai as Receiver. Applications for modification were subsequently filed, leading to the current judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Injunction in Parking Space Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioner failed to establish exclusive right over stilt parking space as it was not part of the sale deed...