Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail in Criminal Appeal Due to Absence on One Day. Court Allows Release on Previous Bail Terms, Emphasizing Absence Did Not Justify Detention.

In Favour of Accused
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the appellant against the State of Gujarat concerning the cancellation of bail. The appellant had been granted bail on 20/08/1999, which was later cancelled on 14/09/2007 due to his absence on a single occasion. The appellant sought interim bail while the appeal was pending. The Supreme Court condoned the delay in the appeal process and permitted the appellant to be released on interim bail under the same terms and conditions as previously granted. The court emphasized that the absence on one day did not justify the cancellation of bail, thus allowing the appellant's release. The other two appeals were also acknowledged, with notice issued for them to be returned in four weeks. The decision was made by Justices Altamas Kabir and Markandey Katju on April 16, 2008.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Interim Bail - Grant of interim bail on previous terms - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section Not mentioned - The court considered the appellant's previous bail status and the reason for cancellation, allowing interim bail under the same conditions as before. Held that the appellant's absence on one day did not warrant continued detention (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be granted interim bail after cancellation due to absence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court granted interim bail to the appellant on the same terms as previously granted, emphasizing that the absence on one day did not warrant continued detention.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Interim Bail
  • Delay Condonation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2008 LawText (SC) (04) 233

Criminal Appeal No. D9833 of 2008

2008-04-16

Altamas Kabir, Markandey Katju

Raman Devji Varli

State of Gujarat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal regarding bail cancellation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought interim bail.

Filing Reason

Cancellation of bail due to absence.

Previous Decisions

Bail was granted on 20/08/1999 and cancelled on 14/09/2007.

Issues

Whether the absence on one day justified the cancellation of bail. Whether interim bail should be granted under previous terms.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that absence on one day should not lead to cancellation of bail. State's position on the cancellation of bail due to absence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a single day's absence does not justify the cancellation of bail, allowing for interim bail under previous conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

Delay condoned. Let the appellant, who has been on bail granted by this Court earlier on 20/08/1999 and whose bail was cancelled only on the ground that he was absent on one day on 14/09/2007, be released on interim bail on the same terms and conditions.

Procedural History

The appellant's bail was initially granted on 20/08/1999, later cancelled on 14/09/2007 due to absence, leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant awarded Rs.4,50,000/- for injuries sustained in accident, enhancing Tribunal's award of Rs.2,10,500/-.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Termination from PTI Post Due to Non-Availability of Vacant Post. Appointment as Physical Training Instructor was invalid as only one sanctioned post existed, occupied by a senior employee.