Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Allotment Dispute — No Grounds for Review Established. The petitioners failed to demonstrate any factual or legal basis for reviewing the earlier judgment regarding the resumption of the plot under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a review petition filed by M/s Dulari Exports Ltd. and others against H.S.I.D.C. Ltd. concerning the resumption of a plot allotted for factory construction. The petitioners had initially paid four installments but failed to pay the fifth installment on time, leading to a show cause notice from the Corporation regarding the non-compliance of construction conditions. The Corporation offered the petitioners a chance to retain the plot at the current rate, which they did not accept, leading to the rejection of their objections and a directive to hand over possession of the plot. The petitioners contended that the Corporation had not formally resumed the plot and argued that they had completed construction and commenced production during the pendency of their writ petition. However, the court found that the Corporation's actions effectively amounted to a resumption of the plot. The court also noted that any subsequent events, such as the completion of construction, did not provide grounds for reviving the offer to pay the earlier rate. Ultimately, the court dismissed the review petition, stating that the petitioners could tender the requisite amount within seven days for acceptance. The review petition was dismissed with costs assessed at Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakh only).

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review of Judgment - Grounds for Review - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 47 - The court dismissed the review petition as the petitioners failed to establish any factual or legal grounds for review of the earlier judgment regarding the resumption of the plot. The court noted that the petitioners did not accept the offer for regularization within the stipulated period, thus upholding the earlier decision (Paras 1-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the review petitioners established grounds for review of the earlier judgment regarding the resumption of the plot.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, stating that the petitioners failed to establish any grounds for review. The court ordered that if the petitioners tender the requisite amount to the Corporation within seven days, it shall be accepted without demur. Costs were assessed at Rs. 1,00,000.

Law Points

  • Review of judgment
  • resumption of plot
  • compliance with conditions of allotment
  • acceptance of payment
  • equitable orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (07) 168

Review Petition No. 1079 of 2008 in Civil Appeal No. 4130 of 2008

2009-07-16

S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Puneet Bali

M/s Dulari Exports Ltd. & Ors.

H.S.I.D.C. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition regarding the resumption of an allotted plot for factory construction.

Remedy Sought

Review-Petitioners sought to overturn the earlier judgment regarding the resumption of the plot.

Filing Reason

The petitioners contended that the Corporation had not properly resumed the plot and that they had complied with conditions.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had allowed a writ petition filed by the Review-Petitioners, which was later reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether the review petitioners established grounds for review of the earlier judgment regarding the resumption of the plot.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Corporation did not formally resume the plot and that they had completed construction. The Corporation contended that the petitioners failed to comply with the conditions of allotment and did not accept the offer for regularization.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the actions of the Corporation amounted to a de facto resumption of the plot, and the petitioners' failure to accept the offer within the stipulated time barred their claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The Review-Petitioners had paid four installments. The objections filed by you have been duly considered. Possession can be directed to be handed over only on resumption of plot.

Procedural History

The review petition was filed following a judgment dated 16th May 2008, which had disposed of the appeal filed by the Corporation regarding the resumption of the plot.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Preliminary Decree Granting 1/3rd Share to Plaintiffs. Court holds that plaintiffs established their claim over ancestral property and that the suit was not barred by limitation.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in FERA Repeal Case — Appeal Against Post-Repeal Adjudication Order Lies Before Appellate Tribunal Under Section 19 of FEMA, Not Special Director (Appeals) Under Section 17 of FEMA. The Court held that t...