Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Case to Gurgaon Due to Lack of Objection. Transfer Ordered as Respondent-Husband Expressed No Objection to the Transfer of the Case Under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a matrimonial case between the parties, with the appellant seeking to transfer the case from the Court of Additional District Judge, Panipat to a competent court in Gurgaon. The appellant filed a petition under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for this transfer. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition, reasoning that the respondent-husband had not insisted on the personal presence of the appellant at every hearing. Upon appeal to the Supreme Court, the respondent-husband expressed no objection to the transfer. The Supreme Court, considering this lack of objection, allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed that the case be transferred to the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, for assignment to a court dealing with matrimonial matters. The decision was made to facilitate the proceedings in a more suitable jurisdiction.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Jurisdiction - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 24 - The appellant sought transfer of a matrimonial case from Panipat to Gurgaon. The High Court dismissed the application based on the respondent's lack of insistence on the wife's presence. The Supreme Court allowed the transfer as the respondent-husband had no objection, thereby facilitating the proceedings in a more convenient jurisdiction. Held that the transfer was warranted under the circumstances (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of the matrimonial case from Panipat to Gurgaon should be allowed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed the transfer of the matrimonial case to the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Gurgaon.

Law Points

  • Transfer of cases
  • matrimonial disputes
  • jurisdiction
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • Hindu Marriage Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (05) 65

Civil Appeal No. 3175 of 2009

2009-05-04

D.K. Jain, B. Sudhershan Reddy

Rajni Vaid

Naveen Vaid

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer of matrimonial case

Remedy Sought

Transfer of case to Gurgaon

Filing Reason

To facilitate proceedings in a more convenient jurisdiction

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed the transfer application

Issues

Transfer of matrimonial case jurisdiction Respondent's objection to transfer

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought transfer for convenience Respondent expressed no objection to transfer

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of convenience in matrimonial disputes and allowed the transfer when the respondent expressed no objection.

Judgment Excerpts

The sole factor which has weighed with the High Court in dismissing the application is that the respondent-husband has never insisted upon the personal presence of the wife on every date of hearing. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed; the impugned order is set aside and it is ordered that suit... shall stand transferred to the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Gurgaon.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a petition for transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was dismissed by the High Court. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24, Section 151
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Minority Institutions' Appeal in Teacher Selection Dispute — Amendment to Regulation 17 Not Applicable to Pending Selections. Selection Process Concludes Upon Forwarding of Proposal to DIOS for Approval Under Section 16-FF(3) o...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Employee — No Requirement for Departmental Inquiry Established. The court found that termination during probation based on performance assessment does not require a departmental inquiry.