Supreme Court Upholds Decision on Arbitration Clause Incorporation in Sub-Contract — Clarifies Requirements for Valid Incorporation. The court ruled that a mere reference to a document does not automatically incorporate an arbitration clause; specific intention to incorporate the clause must be evident.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a sub-contract between a contractor and a sub-contractor regarding the construction of a project for the Public Works Department of Kerala. The main contract between the Public Works Department and the contractor included an arbitration clause, which the sub-contractor claimed was incorporated into their sub-contract. The sub-contractor argued that the sub-contract's terms indicated that it would be governed by the main contract's terms, including the arbitration clause. The contractor denied this claim, leading to the sub-contractor filing an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for arbitration. The High Court rejected the application, stating that the arbitration clause was not incorporated into the sub-contract. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, clarifying that for an arbitration clause to be incorporated by reference, there must be a clear intention to do so, which was not present in this case. The court distinguished between mere reference and incorporation, stating that the wording of the sub-contract suggested only the adoption of terms related to execution, excluding the arbitration clause. The court also noted that even if the arbitration clause had been incorporated, it would not apply to the sub-contract due to its specific provisions tailored to the main contract. Ultimately, the court found no error in the High Court's rejection of the sub-contractor's application for arbitration.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Incorporation of Arbitration Clause - Requirements for Valid Incorporation - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 7(5) - The court held that a mere reference to a document does not automatically incorporate an arbitration clause; specific intention to incorporate the clause must be evident. The court emphasized that the wording of the sub-contract indicated only the intention to adopt terms related to execution, not the arbitration clause (Paras 15-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitration clause in a main contract is incorporated by reference into a sub-contract.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, ruling that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties as the arbitration clause from the main contract was not incorporated into the sub-contract.

Law Points

  • arbitration agreement
  • incorporation by reference
  • construction of contracts
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • section 7(5)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2009 LawText (SC) (07) 144

Civil Appeal No. 4150 of 2009

2009-07-07

R.V. Raveendran, J., J.M. Panchal

M.R. Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

Som Datt Builders Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding incorporation of arbitration clause in a sub-contract.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought arbitration for dispute resolution.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed that the arbitration clause from the main contract was incorporated into the sub-contract.

Previous Decisions

The High Court rejected the application for arbitration, stating no arbitration agreement existed.

Issues

Whether the arbitration clause in the main contract was incorporated into the sub-contract. What constitutes a valid incorporation of an arbitration clause by reference.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the sub-contract's terms indicated incorporation of the main contract's arbitration clause. The respondent contended that the arbitration clause was not incorporated and the sub-contract only adopted terms related to execution.

Ratio Decidendi

For an arbitration clause to be incorporated by reference, there must be a clear intention to incorporate it, which was not present in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that arises for consideration is whether the provision for arbitration contained in the contract between principal employer and the contractor, was incorporated by reference in the sub-contract between the contractor and sub-contractor. The wording of Sec. 7(5) of the Act makes it clear that a mere reference to a document would not have the effect of making an arbitration clause from that document, a part of the contract. In the absence of a clear or specific indication that the main contract in entirety including the arbitration agreement was intended to be made applicable to the sub-contract between the parties, we are of the view that the arbitration clause in the main contract did not form part of the sub-contract between the parties.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to comply with a request for arbitration. The High Court rejected the application, leading to this appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Writ Petition Dismissed for Default with Costs. Restoration granted due to satisfactory explanation for counsel's absence at the hearing.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt...