Supreme Court Allows B.A.M.S. Student to Complete Course Despite Initial Ineligibility — Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit Applied. The Court held that the appellant's subsequent passing of English and completion of almost the entire course under interim orders warranted relief, overriding the initial eligibility defect.

In Favour of Accused
  • 425
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, after completing his 10+2 from Madhya Pradesh Sanskrit Board in 2008, secured admission to B.A.M.S. course in a private college in September 2008. He completed the first year but the college was de-recognized. In July 2012, students were transferred to a government college, but the appellant was denied transfer on the ground that he had not passed English in 10+2. He filed a writ petition in October 2012, and the High Court granted interim orders allowing him to attend classes. Meanwhile, the government college had issued a provisional allotment letter in September 2012, conditionally admitting him subject to passing English. During the pendency of the writ petition, the appellant reappeared for 12th class examination with English and passed it in March 2013, and also passed a senior secondary examination through NIOS in June 2014. He completed the entire B.A.M.S. course and part of internship. However, the High Court dismissed his writ petition in June 2014 and review petition in August 2014, holding that initial ineligibility could not be cured. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court orders, and directed that the appellant be permitted to complete his course and internship and be issued his degree. The Court applied the principle of actus curiae neminem gravabit and noted that the ineligibility was cured by the appellant during the pendency of the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Eligibility for Admission - Curing Ineligibility - The appellant was initially ineligible for B.A.M.S. admission as he had not passed English in 10+2, but the college provisionally admitted him on condition of passing English, which he later did. The Supreme Court held that the subsequent curing of ineligibility, coupled with the fact that he completed almost the entire course under interim orders, warranted allowing him to complete the course and obtain degree. (Paras 7-9)

B) Principle of Law - Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit - An act of the court shall not prejudice anyone. The High Court's dismissal of the writ petition after the appellant had completed nearly six years of study under interim orders was held to violate this principle. (Para 8)

C) Education Law - Interim Orders - Equities - Though the interim order stated that the appellant would not be entitled to claim equities, the Supreme Court held that the fact that he was permitted to complete the entire course and part of internship could not be brushed aside. (Para 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a student who was initially ineligible for admission to B.A.M.S. course due to lack of English subject in 10+2, but subsequently passed English and completed almost the entire course under interim orders, should be allowed to complete the course and obtain degree.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Orders dated 18.06.2014 and 01.08.2014 of Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside. Appellant permitted to complete course and internship in Shaskiya Swasashi Dhanwantari Ayurvedic Medical College, Ujjain, and authorities to issue B.A.M.S. degree. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Eligibility for admission
  • Curing ineligibility
  • Actus curiae neminem gravabit
  • Equities
  • Interim orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (3) 180

Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 34567 of 2014 (assumed)

2025-03-18

Sanjay Kumar, J.

Zaid Sheikh

The State of Madhya Pradesh and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging denial of transfer to government college and completion of B.A.M.S. course due to initial ineligibility.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought permission to complete B.A.M.S. course and obtain degree.

Filing Reason

Appellant was denied transfer to government college after his original college was de-recognized, on ground that he had not passed English in 10+2.

Previous Decisions

Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.10267 of 2012 on 18.06.2014 and Review Petition No.236 of 2014 on 01.08.2014.

Issues

Whether the appellant's initial ineligibility for B.A.M.S. admission due to lack of English subject in 10+2 can be cured by subsequently passing English during the pendency of the writ petition. Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the writ petition despite the appellant having completed almost the entire course under interim orders.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he had passed English during the pendency of the writ petition and had completed almost the entire course, and that the High Court should have considered the peculiar facts. Respondent (State/College) argued that initial ineligibility cannot be cured and that the interim order stated no equities would be claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of actus curiae neminem gravabit (an act of the court shall not prejudice anyone) applies. Where a student has been permitted to study under interim orders and has subsequently cured the initial ineligibility, the court should not deprive him of the fruits of his labour. The subsequent passing of English and completion of almost the entire course warranted relief.

Judgment Excerpts

An act of the Court should, ordinarily, not prejudice anyone (Actus curiae neminem gravabit). Given these peculiar facts, we are of the opinion that this is a fit case for interference so that the appellant is not left out in the cold after completing almost the entire course.

Procedural History

Appellant filed Writ Petition No.10267 of 2012 in Madhya Pradesh High Court in October 2012. Interim order granted on 30.10.2012 allowing attendance. Writ dismissed on 18.06.2014. Review Petition No.236 of 2014 dismissed on 01.08.2014. Special Leave Petitions filed in November 2014 with 45 days delay, condoned in 2019. Appeals allowed by Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Madhya Pradesh Ayurveda/Unani/Homeopathy Undergraduate Entrance Examination Rules - 2008:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Convict's Ordinary Leave for Fertility Treatment in Right to Procreation Case. Right to Procreation Recognized as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Rejection of Leave Based on Speculative Ground...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of POCSO Act — Mandatory Recording of Child Victim's Evidence Within 30 Days Not Followed. The court held that the omission to record the child vi...