Supreme Court Upholds Public Health Rights by Prohibiting Smoking in Public Places — Protects Non-Smokers from Passive Smoking.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Murli S. Deora against the Union of India and others, seeking to prohibit smoking in public places due to its harmful effects on non-smokers. The petitioner highlighted that smoking not only affects smokers but also poses significant health risks to passive smokers, leading to diseases such as lung cancer and heart ailments. The court noted the alarming statistics regarding tobacco-related deaths and the economic burden of tobacco-related diseases on the country. During the proceedings, the Attorney General and other counsel supported the petitioner's request for a ban on smoking in public places, emphasizing the need for immediate action until formal legislation could be enacted. The court acknowledged the lack of response from the Central Government regarding the matter and decided to take proactive measures. It issued a directive prohibiting smoking in various public places, including auditoriums, hospitals, educational institutions, and public conveyances, to protect citizens' health. The court ordered the Union of India and state governments to take effective steps to implement this prohibition and ensure public awareness through media. Compliance reports were to be submitted within five weeks, and the case was scheduled for further hearing after six weeks.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - The court recognized that non-smokers should not be subjected to health risks due to smoking in public places, which indirectly deprives them of their right to life. The court directed the prohibition of smoking in public places until legislative measures are enacted to address the issue effectively. Held that the health of passive smokers must be protected (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether smoking in public places should be prohibited to protect non-smokers from health hazards.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court prohibited smoking in public places and directed the Union of India and state governments to take effective steps for implementation. Compliance reports were to be submitted within five weeks.

Law Points

  • Fundamental rights
  • public health
  • smoking prohibition
  • passive smoking
  • legislative enactment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2001 LawText (SC) (11) 20

Writ Petition (civil) 316 of 1999

2001-11-02

M.B. Shah, R.P. Sethi

2001 Supp(4) SCR 650

Murli S. Deora

Union of India and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

Remedy Sought

Prohibition of smoking in public places.

Filing Reason

To protect non-smokers from health hazards caused by passive smoking.

Issues

Prohibition of smoking in public places Health risks to non-smokers

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued for the prohibition of smoking in public places due to health risks. The Attorney General supported the prohibition citing public health concerns.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to be protected from health hazards caused by passive smoking in public places.

Judgment Excerpts

Fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India, inter alia, provides that none shall be deprived of his life without due process of law. The persons not indulging in smoking cannot be compelled to or subjected to passive smoking on account of acts of the smokers.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 1999, and orders were passed on 31st August 2001 and 28th September 2001 regarding the implementation of the 1975 Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Cigarettes (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act:
  • Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Bill:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Magistrate's Order on Section 313 CrPC Examination — No Right to Advance Copy of Questions. Accused Not Entitled to Copies of Questions Under Section 313 CrPC; Sub-section (5) Only Permits Assistance...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.