Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Due to Appellant's Death. Appeal Abated Following Appellant's Expiry After Filing, Rendering Proceedings Inadmissible.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a criminal appeal filed by the appellant, Vijayamoni, against the respondents, Jayarajan and another. After the appeal was filed in 2003, it was brought to the court's attention that the appellant had expired. The learned counsel for the appellant informed the court about the appellant's death, leading to the consideration of whether the appeal could proceed. The court determined that the appeal had abated due to the appellant's death, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The court's decision was based on the principle that an appeal cannot continue after the death of the appellant, thereby concluding the matter.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Abatement of Appeal - Dismissal due to Death of Appellant - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section Not mentioned - The appeal was dismissed as having abated following the death of the appellant after filing the appeal in 2003. Held that the appeal cannot continue post the appellant's demise (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal can proceed after the death of the appellant

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as having abated due to the death of the appellant.

Law Points

  • Abatement of appeal
  • Death of appellant
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (SC) (08) 143

Criminal Appeal No. 276 of 2003

2010-08-17

Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

Vijayamoni

Jayarajan & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal

Issues

Whether the appeal can proceed after the death of the appellant

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant has expired, leading to the abatement of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal cannot continue after the death of the appellant, leading to its abatement.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the appellant states that after the filing of the appeal in the year 2003, the appellant has expired. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as having abated.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed in 2003, and the court was informed of the appellant's death before the judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Disciplinary Proceedings of Bank Employee Due to Natural Justice Violation. Non-communication of Inquiry Report and Reasons for Disagreement Rendered Punishments Unsustainable.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act — Non-Supply of Passports Not Prejudicial. The court found that the detention order was based on the detenu's own admissions rather than the passport entries.