Bombay High Court Quashes LOC Issued by ED in PMLA Case Due to Non-Review as Per MHA Guidelines. Failure to periodically review Look Out Circulars as mandated by Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021 renders the LOC unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 609
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a petition seeking quashing of a Look Out Circular (LOC) dated 1st October 2019 issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case. The petitioner was arrested on 11th October 2019 and released on bail on 30th November 2019 by the Special Court, Mumbai, with a condition not to leave India without prior permission. Post-bail, the petitioner travelled overseas on five occasions with court permission and returned each time. The petitioner argued that the LOC was not reviewed periodically as mandated by the Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021. The court examined the LOC and noted that the reason for its issuance was that the petitioner was an associate of Iqbal Mirchi and suspected to be involved in conspiracy to transfer proceeds of crime overseas. The court found that the ED failed to place on record any evidence of periodic review of the LOC as required by Clause J of the Office Memorandum. The court held that the LOC was unsustainable due to non-compliance with the review mandate. The petition was allowed, and the LOC was quashed and set aside. The court clarified that the petitioner must comply with bail conditions and that the ED may issue a fresh LOC if occasion arises in accordance with law. The petitioner was also granted liberty to apply for return of passport before the trial court.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Look Out Circular - Periodic Review - Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021, Clause J - The originating agency is required to review LOCs on a quarterly and annual basis and submit proposals to delete the LOC if necessary. Failure to do so renders the LOC unsustainable. (Paras 7-8)

B) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Bail Conditions - Travel Abroad - The petitioner had been granted bail with a condition not to leave India without prior permission. The petitioner had travelled abroad on five occasions with permission and returned, demonstrating compliance. (Paras 4, 6)

C) Criminal Procedure - Look Out Circular - Quashing - The court quashed the LOC issued by ED against the petitioner due to non-compliance with review requirements, while clarifying that the ED may issue a fresh LOC if occasion arises. (Paras 8, 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Look Out Circular (LOC) issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can be sustained when the originating agency fails to conduct periodic review as mandated by the Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. LOC dated 1st October 2019 issued by ED against the petitioner is quashed and set aside. Rule made absolute. Petitioner to comply with bail conditions. ED may issue fresh LOC if occasion arises in accordance with law. Petitioner at liberty to apply for return of passport before trial court.

Law Points

  • Look Out Circular
  • periodic review
  • Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum
  • PMLA
  • bail conditions
  • right to travel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 124

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.7100 OF 2024

2024-06-12

Revati Mohite Dere

Mr. Shirsat (for respondent No.3-ED), Learned APP (for respondent No.4-State)

Ranjitsingh Dhanvindersingh Bindra

Union of India Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition seeking quashing of Look Out Circular (LOC) issued by Enforcement Directorate in a PMLA case.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside of LOC dated 1st October 2019.

Filing Reason

LOC was issued without periodic review as mandated by MHA Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021.

Previous Decisions

Petitioner was arrested on 11th October 2019 and granted bail on 30th November 2019 by Special Court, Mumbai, with condition not to leave India without permission. Petitioner travelled overseas on five occasions with court permission.

Issues

Whether the LOC issued by ED is sustainable when the originating agency fails to conduct periodic review as per MHA Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that LOC was not reviewed periodically as mandated by MHA Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021. Petitioner submitted that he was granted bail and had travelled overseas on five occasions with permission, complying with bail conditions. ED produced the LOC and the Office Memorandum but did not place on record any evidence of periodic review.

Ratio Decidendi

A Look Out Circular must be periodically reviewed by the originating agency as per the Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum dated 22nd February 2021. Failure to conduct such review renders the LOC unsustainable and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

As per the office memorandum issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs dated 22nd February 2021, it is incumbent as per clause – 'J' for the Originating Agency to keep reviewing the LOCs opened at its behest on a quarterly and annual basis and submit the proposals to delete the LOC, if any, immediately after such a review. Considering what is stated aforesaid, the petition is allowed and the LOC issued against the petitioner at the behest of the respondent No.3-ED, is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

LOC issued on 1st October 2019 by ED. Petitioner arrested on 11th October 2019. Bail granted on 30th November 2019 by Special Court, Mumbai. Petitioner travelled overseas on five occasions with court permission. Petition filed seeking quashing of LOC. Heard and disposed of by Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit for Price Paid for Undelivered Vacuum Drier — Defendant Failed to Deliver Goods Despite Receiving Advance Payments. The court held that the defendants were liable to refund the advance amount of Rs.2,64,590/- ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Irrigation Project — Market Value Determined Based on Potential and Comparable Sales. Land Acquired for Minor Irrigation Project; Court Finds Land Had Non-Agricultural Potential and...