Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Pardon Granted to Co-Accused in Corruption Case — Jurisdiction of Special Judge Affirmed.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals challenging the order granting pardon to a co-accused in a corruption case. The appellant contended that the Special Judge lacked jurisdiction to grant pardon before the charge-sheet was filed. The case stemmed from a confessional statement made by the co-accused, which led to the prosecution seeking pardon to secure his testimony against the appellant. The Special Judge granted the pardon, which was subsequently challenged but upheld by the High Court. The appellant's main argument revolved around the interpretation of Sections 306 and 307 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, asserting that the Special Judge could only grant pardon post charge-sheet. The court analyzed the statutory provisions and previous case law, concluding that the Special Judge indeed possessed the authority to grant pardon at any stage, including during the investigation. The court emphasized that the purpose of granting pardon is to prevent the failure of justice by enabling the prosecution to secure crucial evidence. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Special Judge's jurisdiction and directing that the trial be conducted independently of the pardon order's observations.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Grant of Pardon - Jurisdiction of Special Judge - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 306, 307; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 5(2) - The Special Judge has the power to grant pardon at any stage of the investigation, including prior to the filing of the charge-sheet, as per Section 5(2) of the P.C. Act. The court held that denying this power would hinder the administration of justice and the ability to secure evidence against serious offences (Paras 44-46).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Special Judge had the jurisdiction to grant pardon prior to the filing of the charge-sheet.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Special Judge's jurisdiction to grant pardon prior to the filing of the charge-sheet and directed that the trial be conducted independently of the pardon order's observations.

Law Points

  • jurisdiction of Special Judge
  • grant of pardon
  • Code of Criminal Procedure
  • Prevention of Corruption Act
  • legal fiction
  • original jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (SC) (11) 120

Criminal Appeal Nos. 2164-2165 of 2011

2011-11-22

Asok Kumar Ganguly, Gyan Sudha Misra

Sunil Kumar

Bangaru Laxman

State (through CBI) & another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order granting pardon to a co-accused in a corruption case.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the validity of the pardon granted.

Filing Reason

The appellant argued that the pardon was granted without jurisdiction prior to the charge-sheet.

Previous Decisions

The High Court upheld the Special Judge's order granting pardon.

Issues

Jurisdiction of Special Judge to grant pardon Timing of pardon in relation to charge-sheet filing

Submissions/Arguments

The Special Judge lacked jurisdiction to grant pardon before the charge-sheet. The State argued that the Special Judge has the power to grant pardon at any stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act has the jurisdiction to grant pardon at any stage of the investigation, including before the filing of the charge-sheet, to prevent the failure of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in these appeals is to an order dated 17.7.2006 by which the learned Special Judge granted pardon to respondent No. 2. The main argument by the appellant in this case is that pardon could not be granted by the Special Court prior to the filing of the charge-sheet. The Special Judge has the power to grant pardon at any stage of the investigation, including prior to the filing of the charge-sheet.

Procedural History

The Special Judge granted pardon on 17.7.2006, which was challenged in the High Court and upheld on 30.8.2010, leading to the present appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 306, 307, 308
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: 5(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Termination of Constable for False Declaration. The appellant's termination was justified due to knowingly providing false information in the verification form, which is critical for assessing suitability for em...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages for Delayed and Undelivered LPG Cylinders. Arbitrator's interpretation of contractual clauses upheld as not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and C...