Supreme Court Upholds Prohibition on Commercial Activities in Tribal Buffer Zone — Ensures Compliance with Regulations.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a special leave petition filed by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Administration against a judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which had dismissed their appeal against a single judge's order quashing a notification that prohibited commercial activities within a Buffer Zone around the Jarawa Tribal Reserve. The notification, issued on 30.10.2007, declared a five-kilometer radius around the reserve as a Buffer Zone, restricting entry to members of the aboriginal tribe only. The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the continuance of commercial activities in this area, with the petitioners arguing for limited exceptions while the respondents insisted on strict adherence to the prohibition. The court reviewed the notification and determined that the prohibition was absolute and unconditional. It emphasized that until the notification was amended or rescinded, no commercial activities could be permitted. The court directed the Principal Secretary and other officials to ensure compliance with this order, warning that any violations would result in contempt proceedings. The judgment underscored the importance of protecting the rights and welfare of the aboriginal tribes in the region.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Prohibition of Commercial Activities - Absolute prohibition on commercial activities in Buffer Zone - Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Regulation, 1956, Section 3(1) - The court held that the prohibition contained in the notification dated 30.10.2007 is unconditional, and no commercial or tourism-related activities can be allowed until the notification is rescinded or amended. The court directed total compliance with the prohibition and warned of contempt for any breach (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether commercial and tourism-related activities can be permitted within the Buffer Zone around the Jarawa Tribal Reserve.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the absolute prohibition on commercial and tourism-related activities within the Buffer Zone as per the notification dated 30.10.2007 and directed total compliance with the prohibition, warning of contempt for any violations.

Law Points

  • Prohibition of commercial activities
  • compliance with regulations
  • protection of aboriginal tribes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (SC) (07) 3

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12125 of 2010

2012-07-02

G. S. Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

Indira Jaising, S. Ganesh

LG, Andaman & Nicobar Islands and others

M/s. Bare Foot Inns and Leisure Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the legality of a notification prohibiting commercial activities in a designated Buffer Zone.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to allow certain commercial activities within the Buffer Zone.

Filing Reason

The petitioners contested the quashing of the notification by the High Court.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had dismissed the appeal against the single judge's order quashing the notification.

Issues

Validity of the prohibition on commercial activities Compliance with the notification and its implications

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for limited exceptions to the prohibition Respondents insisted on strict adherence to the prohibition

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the unconditional nature of the prohibition on commercial activities in the Buffer Zone to protect the rights of aboriginal tribes.

Judgment Excerpts

The prohibition contained in the above reproduced notification and order dated 6.11.2007 passed by Tehsildar, Ferrargunj is unconditional. It shall be the duty of the Principal Secretary (Tribal Welfare) and other officers of the Administration of Andaman and Nicobar to ensure total compliance of the prohibition contained in notification dated 30.10.2007.

Procedural History

The special leave petition was filed challenging the High Court's dismissal of the appeal against the single judge's order quashing the notification. Notice was issued on 8.3.2010, and the operation of the judgment was stayed. Several interim orders were passed to ensure compliance with the notification.

Acts & Sections

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Regulation: Section 3(1)
  • Contempt of Courts Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes Patta Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice — Revenue Authorities Directed to Hear Petitioners Before Cancelling Patta. Court Holds That Interim Orders of Civil Court Must Be Considered by Revenue Authoritie...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Negotiating Bank in Letter of Credit Dispute. Issuing Bank's Acceptance of Documents Under Irrevocable LC Is Final and Cannot Be Revoked Based on Allegations of Forgery Without Evidence.